Subjects:   Mind Control | Masonic ArchitectureGeneral Research | Weaponized Psychiatry | Health Scams | More

Original Mind Control Research Series

You can view the entire series or choose a particular article:

  • Mind Control 202: MKULTRA Subjects Gone Wild!

    Mind Control 202: MKULTRA Subjects Gone Wild!

    The shooter in this Huffington Post news article certainly looks crazy.  What I am wondering, however, is whether or not he was deliberately driven crazy by ACTUAL telepathic harassment of the kind that seems to be in widespread use today, and that relies on wireless brain implants which are put into people's heads during covert abduction events. Targeted individuals are reporting this in alarming numbers lately, and this is shaping up to be one of the largest mass human rights violations of all times.     For more on the above story, see MKULTRA Subject Kazuki Hirano Requests Assistance. January 10, 2017 Florida airport shooter Esteban Santiago also complained of being mind-controlled by the CIA: Santiago now faces the death penalty, but the intelligence operatives who run the modern day neurotechnology-based mind control system, and who were ultimately responsible for Santiago's rampage, will undoutedly remain beyond the reach of the "law."   The FBI and police don't get paid to investigate THEM.  No, many of your "law enforcement" personnel have in fact sworn formal oaths to conceal their crimes.  They will do so as they wish to continue receiving their paychecks.  So instead, they'll just take mind control subjects in for "mental health" evaluations, a process that involves no trial and no jury.  Because the psychiatric establishment is, after all, just an arm of system designed in large part to conceal the existence of classified mind-invasive technology.   The domestic war criminals remain free, and the victims are conveniently locked up.  The families of the shooting victims will likely applaud the enforcement droids who in reality work for the people responsible for the deaths of, or injuries to, their kin. And the general public will continue not to care.   They will keep watching football, and voting in their rigged elections, and tuning in to see the latest episode of the Walking Dead, and signing up to serve in the armies of whatever "national government" rules their particular chunk of land, and pretending everything is just fine. September 16, 2017Apparent mind-control subject Anissa Weier will be confined for at least three years to MKULTRA hospital I just came across the case of Anissa Weier, a twelve-year-old girl who was involved in the stabbing of another kid based on her delusion that a fictional character was going to hurt her if she didn't.  As with so many other "mentally ill" attackers, Weier reported that she believed her mind was being read. As those who have studied this website will immediately realize, this is a red flag indicating that the actor is most likely a CIA mind control subject.  Synthetic telepathy neurotechnology has existed for a long time and is a key tool used in manipulating mind control subjects. But it remains classified and they can get away with claiming people like Anissa Weier are simply "mentally ill."  The following are a few snippets from "news media" coverage of the Weier case, with my markings in red:   It seems to me that Anissa Weier's problems have only just begun.  She is an apparent mind control subject who is now being taken away from her family and locked up in a mental hospital -- where she will spend at least three years in the physical custody of the very MKULTRA psychiatrists who are responsible for both her mind control and her violent actions. Another life ruined.  9/19/2017 update - Another interesting aspect of the Weier case is that the perpetrators' motive was to offer their victim as a human sacrifice.  For a background on why this is highly relevant to mind control, see the links below under "Related." October 3, 2017 update - Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock The intelligence agency (state-) controlled American mass media won't talk about this.  Instead, they'll just have one of their PR puppets (euphemistically referred to as "reporters") talk about how one of their different PR puppets (euphemistically referred to as "politicians") wants to introduce stricter gun control legislation, which is an "obviously" needed response: Parkland school shooter Nikolas Cruz was also an apparent CIA mind-control subject Click here for article Waffle House shooter Travis Reinking was also a likely CIA mind-control subject It seems like lately, if there is a mass shooting incident being publicized by the mainstream media, one can pretty safely assume that the shooter was a CIA mind control subject.  In just about every case lately, there exists some major red flag that the "mental health" issues being suffered by these shooters is really a symptom of CIA mind control.  In other words, the "psychiatric problems" are not at all organic or natural, but artificially caused by physical mind control technology being used against the subject (almost certainly in the form of classified brain implants, as discussed elsewhere in this series). In the case of the Nashville Waffle House shooter Travis Reinking, in addition to his more bizarre behavior and claims, he was also an avowed "sovereign citizen" -- meaning someone who publicly rejects the authority of all existing governmental structures.  In other words, he was a political dissident, making him an overwhelmingly obvious target for neutralization by the domestic intelligence services. He had also made statements that he was being subjected to harassment and surveillance, which is commonly reported by individuals who are in fact being targeted by the state.  The problem is that, unlike the citizens of the former Soviet Union or East Germany, the public in the modern western World doesn't get that they are in fact living in an intelligence-agency-controlled dictatorship that controls the mass media, so the normal citizens just buy into whatever BS the "media" reports -- in this case, that these mass shooters have "mental health" issues and that gun control is the solution.  What is really happening here is that we are living in a dictatorship in which the very concept of political dissent cannot be permitted to exist; rather, anyone who disputes the authority of the state must be delusional, since the state's absolute authority is beyond question. In Reinking's case, the media focuses on the horror of the atrocity itself, and the delusional symptoms of the shooter (in Reinking's case, his erratic behavior and delusional beliefs about Taylor Swift) but of course does not discuss the true underlying cause of the mental illness. Related: Freemasonry 101: MKULTRA and the Masonic Lodge Freemasonry 301: Blood Debts and Human Sacrifice Freemason Norwegian Shooter Anders Breivik was Mind-Controlled MKULTRA Subject Kazuki Hirano Requests Assistance Mind Control 201: Brain Implant Bloopers
  • Mind Control 402: Brain Implants vs. Directed-Energy Weapons

    Mind Control 402: Brain Implants vs. Directed-Energy Weapons

    This exhibit is designed to point out the critically important distinction between neurotechnology and directed energy weapons.     In this exhibit, building on the work of silenced victim/activist Jeremy, I will focus on the all-too-common "straw man" disinformation dealing with the irrelevant topic of "directed energy weapons."  Material on this subject is being widely disseminated via internet sites dedicated to targeted individual issues, so as to divert victims' attention from resources dealing with the classified MKULTRA neurotechnology actually in use. In these campaigns, operatives masquerading as victims publish websites and participate on internet discussion forums.   In more than one instance, they have solicited monetary donations from actual victims for the claimed purpose of purchasing expensive equipment to figure out what "frequencies" are being "beamed" at them.   The primary purpose is not to collect money as such (although depriving targeted individuals of financial resources is certainly a related goal) but rather in this instance to frame the very issue of targeting itself in terms of "directed energy weapons" abuses -- which is a smokescreen. Directed-energy weapons are a fact of modern military and law-enforcement technology and without a doubt are subject to abuse by authorities.   However, spending money on frequency counting equipment is probably not going to help you if what you are actually dealing with is advanced classified neurotechnology in your brain.  The solution to brain implants would be removal or disabling of the device. Trying to "block the frequency" as such would probably be an exercise in futility.  For example, modern GSM cellular networks use advanced frequency-hopping algorithms where the frequency of the transmission changes several hundred times per second according to a pre-determined mathematical formula.  Whatever type of wireless network is being used to control the brain implants is probably also using some type of extremely advanced frequency hopping and/or spread-spectrum technologies. I suspect that the guys who engineered these systems probably get a big laugh over all the victims on the internet trying to figure out what "frequency" they are being "attacked" by. The following clippings from the web serve as inline footnotes to the above discussion.   I continue with additional comments below. [From:] John Allman (quoting Jeff) "spending money on frequency counting equipment is not going to help you if you're dealing with highly-advanced, classified neurotechnology in your brain" I agree. But I wouldn't recommend equipment that detected carrier waves, but not modulation content, to anybody. Consider somebody who has experiences that suggest that he (or she) is being manipulated, either directly or via a prosthesis. How can he tell which?   [Response from Jeff] If you mean remote mind control via implant versus without implant, then I am not actually sure. My best answer would be to say that I agree with Jeremy's appraisal of the situation at the Bioethics hearings, which I have pasted below for your review. I'm not familiar with any devices that can detect/decode "modulation content" of a transmission that is digitally encrypted and/or using frequency hopping spread spectrum types of technologies. You can go to Radio Shack and buy a Bearcat scanner that can pick up the narrow FM carrier frequencies used by a lot of police, fire, ham radio etc. Those are unencrypted analog signals. Some of the newer equipment might also be able to decode some digitally modulated signals, I'm not really sure. But take your modern cell phone on a GSM network, which is one thing I know a bit about. The "modulation content" as you describe it (your spoken voice) is going to be digitally compressed (like an MP3 music file) then encrypted for privacy, all in the phone in real-time, then that encrypted digital signal goes out through the antenna over the airwaves, changing frequency over 200 times per second. That technology was put into commercial use in the 1990s. As advanced as it sounds, IT'S OLD NEWS. So I guess my point would be that advanced classified mind control technology, the effects of which make clear that it is a two-way communication channel directly to your brain and mind itself, is probably going to be using something more advanced that the cell phone technology that has been public knowledge for 20 years or so. So there won't be any commercially available equipment available to you or me that would help us in any way. That's my two cents. Maybe I am wrong. Jeff From: John Allman Dear Jeff, Thank you for your prompt reply. How did [Jeremy from] reach his conclusion that implants that had been rendered undetectable by miniaturisation and/or camouflage, provided "the most likely explanation"? Why do you "agree" with that guess of his? John   [Response from Jeff] Hi John, I don't know how Jeremy reached his conclusions, but I can tell you how I reached mine. I agree with his guess because the capabilities demonstrated by the technology include extremely fine-tuned control of the human mind itself. Therefore, based on my understanding of technology, it seems clear to me that this would be done far more easily with implanted technology than without. It's the simpler solution and therefore the more likely. There are frequently articles in the news nowadays about new machines being built at the nano- or atomic level. Extremely small technology is a fact of modern science. I have documented some examples here. So implants not showing up on conventional scanning equipment doesn't surprise me at all, especially if concealment was one of the design parameters to begin with. It's a guess, but I think a reasonable and informed one. Response from Jeff:   Sounds like "they" (some type of black ops) got you, alright.    Don't rely on keyed locks alone to keep your home secure.   The people who are doing this stuff have master keys that they can use to enter your home even if your doors are locked. They also have the capability to remotely render you unconscious before they even come near your home, so you want to use physical barriers to prevent your home from being entered. Position them in such a way that it would be impossible to enter and exit your home without disturbing them. That way, when you wake up in the morning you will have a concrete way to determine if your home may have been entered while you were asleep. The tones in your ears are a widely reported symptom of mind control, especially by those in the programs masquerading as "alien" abduction.  They probably put implants in your ears. It seems clear that you, like many others today, are a subject of a classified modern mind control program. Spend some time looking at the research material on this website; hopefully some of it will be useful to you. A few weeks ago (I am writing this paragraph on Dec 12, 2012), I started getting e-mail blasts from "Federation Resistance Global Electronic Harassment Opposition Party."   This claims to be a group whose members include some high-profile targeted individuals, several of whom the work of which I have posted on my website in the past.   However, based on subesquent e-mails it appears to be at least primarily the work of a single individual, namely one Greg Gamache. This effort appears extremely questionable to me and I am seeing a LOT of red flags.   They are sending out e-mails encouraging people to sign up for a lawsuit which they allege will result in FBI and FCC action to get their "EH" (electronic harassment) "turned off." I don't think the FBI or FCC are in any position to do anything about this.   I think that this is something that is occurring at a level of power above that of the visible agencies of our government, and I don't think that "electronic harassment" is an accurate choice of terminology to begin with. Nonsense if you ask me.   Frequency counters will not "detect frequencies going to you" unless it is A) a single frequency, and B) so strong that it is more powerful than any other at the same spot.    If someone is within a short distance of you pointing some kind of powerful microwave or radio transmitter directly at you, then maybe this would stand a chance.     But if I am correct and what most targeted individuals are dealing with on a daily basis is not directed energy but neurotechnology in their brains, then a frequency counter is not going to detect the source of your problem.  There may not even be any transmission active at the time of the measurement, and even if there was it would be lost among all the other radio transmissions passing through the same location, like local communications systems, TV, broadcast radio, cell phones, etc.   As a point of comparison, your cell phone sits idle monitoring a control channel the vast majority of the time.   It's listening but that control channel transmission from the cell tower is certainly not going to show up on your frequency counter.    Neither is the TV station miles away which your TV can nevertheless pick up.    Anyone who follows the above advice and videotapes themselves trying to "detect frequencies going to them" will just end up making an ass of themselves on YouTube and making targeted individuals as a group look like fools. Hmm, maybe that's the whole point.  On June 30, 2013 Mr. Gamache sent out another e-mail seemingly designed to bait recipients into taking self-harming actions.  The following bizarre message was carbon copied to no less than 246 people: I can't imagine that anyone would be foolish enough to do as he suggests, but perhaps there are a few desperate people out there who don't understand what is going on here and might get drawn into something like this.    Well, that will wrap up one particularly egregious example of the nonsense now flooding the internet on this subject. Here is a brief exchange with a reader of my website who is somehow involved in activism relating to this subject: From: James Lico <>;   Jeff,   I see that you want to stick to the topic of mind control.  This is the problem we are having when we try to explain the the reason to authorities.  No one believes us because it sounds so incredible.   But now we have a new paradigm which is now believable.  This is the reason why I have to inform the members of my group, because this is so controversial.   How can you tell that we are not being used as human DE lab animals?   [remainder of e-mail put forth sender's argument for DEW abuse] Response from Jeff Dear James, You ask me how can I "tell that we are not being used as human DE lab animals?" There are a million possible abuses that we COULD be subjected to.   Just because something COULD happen does not necessarily mean that it IS happening in a particular case or to a particular group.    If I am reading your first two paragraphs correctly, you are saying that when you complain to the authorities about mind control, no one believes you because it sounds so incredible.   But now, in the topic of directed energy weapons, you have found an explanation which sounds less incredible and therefore constitutes a "new paradigm which is now believable."    In other words, you want to focus on something because it SOUNDS good, regardless of whether or not it is ACTUALLY relevant to your situation.    It puzzles me that your reason for wanting to "sounding believable" is because you want to "try to explain the reason to authorities."     Whether it's mind control or DEWs involved, in EITHER case it is obviously being done by state actors.     So your whole idea about "sounding beleivable to authorities" seems pointless in either case.    That's like a Jew in 1930s Germany trying to report the existence of concentration camps to Nazi troops, and they don't believe him.    Wow, what a surprise! THE AUTHORITIES ARE THE ONES PERPETRATING THE ABUSE.   THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T LISTEN TO YOUR COMPLAINTS.   I am trying to make a very simple point.   MKULTRA mind control abuses using advanced neurotechnology are widespread and out of control.    They are deliberately trying to confuse victims by diverting victims' attention to what I believe is the irrelevant subject of directed energy weapons.    THAT is the fundamental issue facing targeted individuals.      I do not believe that abuse of D.E.W.s is widespread.  EVEN IF IT WAS, however, that would not change the fact that the discussion of D.E.W.s  is purposefully used as a cover for the far greater threat to human freedom posed by the deployment of classified neurotechnology against non-consenting (and mostly unaware) civilians.     I will conclude this research exhibit with an e-mail exchange that I feel nicely summarizes the point I am trying to make: Response from Jeff Dear Jeffery, The phrase "directed energy" is associated with the concept of "directed energy weapons" such as the commercial Active Denial System used by police and military organizations.     In contrast, wireless telecommunications with devices such as smart phones and pagers (or in this case implants) would normally be referred to by other terminology such as radio frequency (RF) or cellular communications.     While it might be technically true to say that all radio communication is in fact a form of "directed energy," in this context it becomes a very misleading use of the phrase, which already has a well-established and particular association with weapons applications. The perpetrators of these war crimes are waging deliberate disinformation campaigns to confuse and mislead MKULTRA subjects (targeted individuals), and promoting false theories about the abuse of "directed energy weapons" is currently one of the primary operations. The following e-mail was received at my non-public e-mail address on November 24, 2014.   More of the same.  Note that the author uses an e-mail address ending with the number "33" (masonic identifier).   In other words, this is clearly another abuser masquerading as a victim.  Derrick Robinson, the leader of FFCHS ("Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance"), an organization allegedly dedicated to helping victims, actively promotes what I contend is extremely harmful disinformation (see MC301) in order to confuse modern MKULTRA subjects about this topic: And here's an excerpt from one of Derrick's newsletters, in which he again promotes this "frequency" nonsense: So I suggest you don't start acting like a nutcase and dressing up like Chuck from the new TV show "Better Call Saul," even though many websites are out there trying to make you believe this will somehow solve your problems.  Otherwise you're likely to find yourself locked up in a mental hospital being laughed at by MKULTRA doctors and psychiatrists.
  • Mind Control 401: The

    Mind Control 401: The "11:11 Phenomenon" Explained in Terms of MKULTRA Neurotechnology

    People with the mind control neurotechnology in their brains can be made to act out ("evoked actions") in many ways, including involuntarily looking over at the clock and "noticing" specific patterns of numbers.   These events are almost certainly pre-programmed and evoked by remote computer systems.   The function of the brain implants is analagous to that of a consumer "smartphone," only much more advanced.    Behavioral conditioning techniques can then be used to associate certain number patterns to specific meanings in the mind of the subject/target.  A few examples: 9:11   Emergency 1:19   Positive association (reverse of 9:11) 1:23   Positive association, moving forward 3:21   Negative association, moving backwards (reverse of 1:23) 4:11   Positive association, "information" 1:14   Negative association, concealment (reverse of 4:11) 11:11  (Widely-reported) Positive "spiritual" themed brainwashing 12:34  An alternative to 11:11 or 1:23 For a number of years now, large numbers of people have been discussing this "11:11 phenomenon" on their websites and blogs: ... and a quick search at Amazon results in a notable number of books written about this subject as well: The simple fact of the matter, however, is that this so-called "spiritual" phenomenon is simply a combination of advanced mind control neurotechnology and classic behavioral conditioning techniques: So don't be a sucker and buy into any of this nonsense.  When the MKULTRA War Criminals Get Bored of 11:11, They Apparently Switch to 12:34
  • Mind Control 105: Neurotechnology and Neuroprosthetics

    Mind Control 105: Neurotechnology and Neuroprosthetics

    Video clip from University of WashingtonRunning time: 1 min 30 seconds
  • Mind Control 103: Non-Consensual Wireless Brain Link (Your ESP is Artificial)

    Mind Control 103: Non-Consensual Wireless Brain Link (Your ESP is Artificial)

    This next excerpt is a response to this article : The following is an excerpt from On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology:    And we thought Star Trek was science fiction ...  
  • Mind Control 101: Classified Synthetic Telepathy Technology Has Been Covertly Implanted in Brains of Countless Civilians

    Mind Control 101: Classified Synthetic Telepathy Technology Has Been Covertly Implanted in Brains of Countless Civilians

     In 1988, an inmate in a Utah prison named James Fratus wrote a letter describing how he was being tortured through the use of some kind of synthetic telepathy technology that allowed his jailers to play back his thoughts over a loudspeaker in real-time.  (Research It)  If you haven't already seen both of the Bioethics Hearings videos (on the home page of this site), and heard Jeremy's podcasts, I would highly recommend you take the time to do so now.  His ideas might shed some light on the "hows" of getting large numbers of people to appear to be harassing someone. There is a very real possibility the abuse of this technology may soon be affecting someone you know or care about, and having as accurate an understanding as possible about what is going on may make all the difference in the world.   It might mean the difference between life and death, or between freedom and institutionalization.   Questions:  Are you familiar with what a modern "smartphone" can do?    What if you remove the screen, buttons and other user interface elements, and just leave the CPU, radio and power source, then miniaturize that?  What if you replace the microphone with an MRI type of detection device that detects neural activity, and the speaker with a device that produces not sound but brainwave patterns?  Then implant the device in somebody's brain while you have them unconscious?   And it has a high-speed connection over a cellular (or other wireless data) network?  Then you leave it there for years and never use it in any way that would cause the implantee to become aware that it was even there.  What if you did this to large numbers of people? Mind Control Tech Leaked in Obscure 1966 Film The film Cyborg 2087 was released in 1966, and featured a scene where a character "from the future" described how in the twenty-first century, all human beings would have their brains implanted from birth, and their thoughts controlled by the state through a technology called radio-telepathy.   In real-world application, the technology today is more commonly referred to as "synthetic telepathy" rather than "radio-telepathy." "Easter Eggs" in Cyborg 2087 This film contains a couple of revelations that apparently were intended to be overlooked by the general public at the time of its release, but which today have become glaringly obvious thanks to internet access making research of these obscure subjects much easier. In the story, the discovery of radio-telepathy is credited to "Dr. Marx," an obvious reference to the alleged founder of communism.    Additionally, the female doctor in the film is named "Dr. Mason," who is tasked with keeping the secret "from falling into the wrong hands."    This  refers to the global occult ("masonic" in the generic sense) network whose members perpetrate horrific crimes against the civilian populations of their own countries using these technologies, and who on pain of death conceal its existence.   Further elucidation on this point is contained in my equally-important research exhibit entitled Freemasonry 101: Mind Control which should be reviewed together with this page.  Additional reference material on the true origins of the Communist ideology falsely attributed to Karl Marx is here. The freeze-frame below shows a scene from the film indicating that the radio-telepathy demonstration takes place at a company named "THE MONARCH CORP."    This is also a hidden "easter egg" revelation: butterflies in general -- and the term "monarch" in particular -- are signature symbols used by real-world mind control operations.   The specific division of the Monarch corporation depicted here is named "Future Industries."   This is an allusion to the fact that technologies are first developed in secret by the military-industrial complex, and only made public after much time (often decades) have passed. Researcher Fritz Springmeier wrote extensively on this subject.  The following is an excerpt from his work: A great deal of Monarch programming and slave abuse, (as well as the drug trade) is done under three major covers or fronts: Religious Fronts, the Front of National Security and the Military, and the Entertainment fields, especially the Country Western Industry, the Rock Music Industry and Hollywood. The religious fronts were popular for centuries, especially when groups like the Jesuits, the Assassins, and other groups held immense power. Religious fronts are still being used such as J.Z. Knight, Elizabeth Claire Prophet's CUT church, the Church of Scientology, the Charismatic movement, Jim Jones and Jonestown, and David Koresh's group etc. Billy Ray Moore's Lord's Chapel is entirely a mind-control operation. There is a nondenomination Pentecostal church in southern Washington whose entire membership is Satanists under mind-control. It would take a book to explain how these religious fronts are part of the total trauma-based mind-control and how they operate to protect mind-control, however there are publications which go into some of the CIA connections to these groups. It is suggested that interested persons read these publications.     Government psychiatrists preemptively defined the complaints that they anticipated would be made by modern MKULTRA victims as first-rank symptoms of schizophrenia and/or other mental disorders. Thought Broadcasting A symptom of schizophrenia in which a patient reports hearing the thoughts of others, being able to broadcast his/her own thoughts, and hear thoughts or voices where none exist. Specific manifestations may include a paranoid belief that thoughts are being recorded and re-broadcast by a radio or by a voice outside one’s heads. When thought broadcasting occurs regularly, it begins to affect behaviour and interferes with the person's ability to function in society Segen's Medical Dictionary. © 2012 Farlex, Inc. Here is a clip from the 2003 film Control Factor, a fictional movie based on actual scientific developments that are not generally known about.   It contains the common disinformation theme of confounding synthetic telepathy neurotechnology with voice-to-skull audio transmission (a point discussed at length in my companion article MC402 - Brain Implants vs. DEWs) but is otherwise quite on-point and relevant in its presentation: This technology is now being used to mind control unsuspecting citizens who have been abducted, had their brains implanted, amnesia then induced (most likely by drugging and/or neurotechnological means), and returned to their beds or other places of abduction with no memory or obvious signs of what happened to them. This is what all the "alien abduction" stories in the media during the past several decades were all about; a cover story for government abductions and mind-control. Researcher Martin Cannon figured this out in the 1990s and wrote one of the most important research papers ever written on the subject, entitled "The Controllers." This essay put forth his theory that "alien abduction" was a cover story for U.S. government mind control programs. Not too long afterwards, he had a rather sudden "change of heart":   Today, we hear less about "aliens" because the technology has gone mainstream, and modern victims are instead lead to believe that they are being "stalked by gangs" or are mentally ill.  In reality, however, it is just the continuation of the atrocities which began no later than the 1950s with MKULTRA. Victims who complain to medical personnel will immediately have their charts noted as having made statements that fit the "diagnostic criteria" for mental illness -- as defined by popular vote (not scientific facts) of participating committee members and then codified into the "DSM" -- the Diagnostic & Statistical Manual used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental disorders.   Once classified as "mentally ill," a person can be deprived of their liberty without regard to the due process protections contained in the Bill of Rights (or similar provisions in many countries outside of the U.S.). The whole system was set up this way on purpose, to accomplish the long-term goal of creating a social order where the population can be directly controlled in a manner most people never would have dreamed possible. This goal is now being realized and will radically change the relationship between governments and individual human beings forever if something is not done to stop it.    How this all turns out depends at least partly on how *you* respond to this information today and in the future.   November 2011     This article is continued in the Mind Control 102, 103, etc. exhibits which are available via the Special Exhibits section of this website (or by clicking the links at the top right).
  • Mind Control 102: The Coercive Induction of Artificial Thoughts and Dreams into the Human Mind

    Mind Control 102: The Coercive Induction of Artificial Thoughts and Dreams into the Human Mind

    The neurotechnology that the secret agencies have been implanting in people's brains not only allows them to modulate/demodulate the neurological patterns associated with human thought ("synthetic telepathy") but by extension also allows them to cause implanted subjects to speak involuntarily out loud. In other words, not only are your private thoughts not necessarily your own, but also when you speak it is possible that the impulse to speak and the choice of words was likewise caused remotely by a government handler/operator. In either case, you will not become consciously aware that the technology is active when you think "their" thoughts or speak "their" words. The technology BYPASSES YOUR CONSCIOUS WILL AND PERCEPTION. You will think the thought, or speak the word, but in most cases you will not be able to discern that it was not of your own will, except in cases where the handler causes an alarm designed to get your attention, such as causing other physiological responses in your body, or sounds in the environment to which you have been conditioned, occurring simultaneously with the artificially-induced thought or speech. What this means is that if you are a subject of these outrageous human rights violations, then your operator/handler has the capability to communicate with you by making you speak THEIR words out loud using YOUR voice, all via remote control of your brain itself. Any complaints you make about this sort of treatment to law enforcement or medical personnel will result in an immediate and automatic diagnosis of schizophrenia which will then make it possible for them to arrest, institutionalize, confine, drug, or further experiment on you against your will. IMPORTANT: The news clippings which follow represent information that is designed for public consumption.    The actual level of technology being covertly deployed against civilian populations is many decades more advanced.  See the other exhibits in this series for a fuller understanding of this critically important topic. The non-public government perfected the synthetic telepathy technology a long time ago.   They can not only read your mind and subconscious thoughts, but the technology allows them to artificially inject thoughts and motor commands into your mind, and it is so seamless that you will never know that it was happening.   You will think the thoughts are your own.   They can also record your thoughts (including any modifications they have introduced without your consent) and use it in ways that are to your detriment, if you are a "targeted individual."     They can also induce artificial dreams including both the visual and auditory components -- in other words, what may in fact be nothing more than digital video transmitted wirelessly to implants in your brain that in turn modulate the signal into the appropriate neurological patterns so that your subconscious mind plays it out as a "dream."    THIS IS REALLY HAPPENING, CLANDESTINELY AND WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE SUBJECTS. It is all vicious, criminal, psychopathic practice of human ownership.   In many respects it is far worse than forms of human slavery practiced in the past, because at least those slaves enjoyed the integrity of their own minds.   A Tapped Brain Allows Them to See What You See UC Berkeley Brain Tapping Demonstration   This is the back cover of the movie Inception.  Like many other Hollywood productions, it's a fictional story incorporating ACTUAL technology that really exists and is being used the government against its own citizens:    I noticed the following odd comment while watching a YouTube video of a man describing his workplace harrasment (and chemical attacks) at a supermarket:      Next, an example of work that the military is doing publicly in this field today, using technology far less advanced (but authorized for public disclosure).   The actual state of technology being secretly used against the citizenry is decades more advanced.   This last clipping from the NIH is a big joke.    "A major step toward cord-free control," indeed.    At a time when every other person seems to have an iPhone glued to their ear, do they really expect people to believe this drivel?   I am here to tell you that a significant portion of the civilian population ALREADY has classified mind control neurotechnology in their brains.     The deployment of the technology has been underway for decades, probably in iterative phases as the real (classified) technology developed.   The people responsible need to be aggressively prosecuted as war criminals.  
  • Mind Control 201: Brain Implant Bloopers

    Mind Control 201: Brain Implant Bloopers

    There have been numerous news items over the last few years about major television news reporters suddenly beginning to speak in complete gibberish during live television presentations.   The writers of these stories always think that something very strange and mysterious is going on, and speculate as to what that might be.  Did the reporter have a stroke on air?   Were they being hit by secret microwaves? There is a simple black-and-white answer.   As I have documented elsewhere in this series, state security services have been covertly implanting citizens with classified "synthetic telepathy" neurotechnology.   My research indicates that the technology was perfected no later than the mid 1960s, and possibly by the 1940s. A significant portion of the civilian population ALREADY has government implants in their brains which allows remote control of the mind (verbal thoughts,  perceived images and sounds, nightly dreams, motor commands).  I don't know the exact numbers, but I have reason to believe that young children in average families have been implanted, so it logically follows that people in positions of public influence like these news reporters would almost certainly be "owned" in this very physical way.  The only thing I'm not really sure about is whether these incidents were caused by malfunctions in the neurotechnology, or were deliberately instigated by the remote operators. I used to have individual videos published of each instance of the reporters having on-air meltdowns, but all of these events have now been included in a compilation video, so I am posting that here instead.    The most interesting thing about this compilation is that whoever edited it together added some text to the very beginning of the video:   "This could be the early steps of humanity evolving into something else in 2012."   Spiritual evolution and 2012 mythology are both extremely common disinformation themes, as I have previously documented (see MC301).   This tells me that the compilation video was probably put together in at attempt at damage control.   Since the story involved television broadcasts that had already been viewed and possibly recorded by millions of people, it could not be simply erased from history.  So a version of the story was deliberately put out with the disinformation text added at the very beginning to throw viewers off track.  Interestingly, the video concludes with an example of this happening to radio co-host Ian Punnett of Coast to Coast AM.   Coast is a widely-syndicated late night talk radio program in the United States which heavily promotes disinformation topics.   Host George Noory introduces the segment in question by saying "next hour, [...] we talk about one of Ian Punnet's favorite subjects, cryptozoology."   I think it is quite telling that an journalist associated with this particular type of program subsequently became a victim of the technology himself. Video running time: 5 minutes The next two videos are evidence that my explanation is correct. Video: Michael Mosley has areas of his brain turned offRunning time: 1 minute Deactivating speech centers of the brain Video running time: 4 minutes   Also See:  Pushing the Envelope in Controlled Media



Masonic Architecture (

You can view the entire series or choose a particular article:

  • 302: There is no 302: There is no "Gang Stalking." There is only "Zersetzung."

      ***************************************************************** Note: The following is an article I found online several years ago (I'm writing this in 2019).  I'm not sure of the actual identity of, or contact information for, the author, or anything about him, but this article fits squarely with everything I know about the subject matter of this exhibit and this website as a whole. JP Retired attorney Bob S explains that COINTELPRO is “a continuing, present reality” and that terms such as “gang stalking” or “organized stalking” are deceptive terms and will work against the TI community in obtaining a new congressional investigation. [name withheld]: I don't know what proving COINTELPRO will do nor if I got it right what Bob S. is doing, because they already know COINTELPRO is a reality. Bob S: [name withheld], whom are you referring to as "they"? The public doesn't know that COINTELPRO is a continuing, present reality. This is what we need to prove to the public in order to create pressure to produce a new congressional investigation of present government COINTELPRO operations. If “they” refers to TI's, most of them have been deceived into believing that they are victims of "organized stalking groups" instead of being COINTELPRO targets. They don't call their experience “COINTELPRO.” They call it “gang-stalking” or “organized stalking.” The bad news Many TI's, including you, do realize that they are targeted by a federal agency, but they still use “organized stalking group” and “gang-stalking” terminology. This is a fatal mistake that Derrick and Eleanor White have been knowingly and intentionally training TI's to make for years. They both know that they are defeating TI rights by using the wrong terminology. I have repeatedly explained this to them for years. They can give no justification for continuing to advocate bad legal strategy that necessitates defeat of all TI's who follow them, but they have both shown their determination to continue to knowingly and intentionally work against TI interests. Neither Derrick nor Eleanor claims to have any knowledge or understanding of law but they both stubbornly reject, for no apparent reason, the best legal advice that I or any other lawyer can give them. They have proved over and over that they are dedicated to defeating the rights of the TI's that they pretend to be helping. That is why I call them “Anti-TI Activists.” “Organized stalking” and “gang stalking” are terms that are misused only within the TI community. These terms are unknown to the outside world, and they are contradictions of established legal terminology outside the TI community. The legal definition of the crime of “stalking” in every state and federal law is “a series of harassing acts by a single person.” Normal TI experiences do not come within the criminal definitions of “stalking.” TI's rarely encounter “a series of harassing acts by a single person. TI experience consist instead of separate acts of harassment by many different people. The law does not permit us to combine separate acts of harassment by separate people so as to make them all guilty of the crime of stalking. There is no such thing as a crime “group stalking.” The law only recognizes the crime of single-person stalking. So if a group of 100 perps each commits a single act of harassment against the same TI, no one has committed a crime. No one is subject to arrest or to prosecution. The TI is not entitled to police investigation. Arrests cannot be justified and prosecutions cannot succeed for the non-criminal activity mistakenly described as “organized stalking.” Such harassment may meet the definition of torture, but torture is not a crime unless it comes within the definition of an established crime. This form of torture does not meet the definition of “stalking” nor the definition of any other crime. Police are not supposed to be investigating non-criminal, non-prosecutable activities. It is useless for them to do so since arrests and prosecutions would be contrary to the law and would ultimately fail. Yet this is what TI's keep uselessly asking police and even the FBI to do. TI's may not like the law. They may think that it ought to be changed, but that is the way the law stands. There are good legal and constitutional reasons why the law cannot be changed to what TI's think it ought to be, but I won't get into that long explanation. TI's can spend years trying vainly to get the law changed to what they think it ought to be, but they need to understand that under existing law, it is utterly useless to ask for investigation and prosecution of “organized stalking” or of “group stalking” or of “gang stalking” since the activities that TI's describe with these mistake terms do not meet the legal definition of the crime of stalking. TI's follow this useless strategy because they have been deceived by Eleanor and Derrick into believing that these non-criminal activities are crimes. It is impossible to achieve success by following a strategy that is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the law. That's the bad news. The good news is that there is a remedy that can stop these activities if we correctly describe them as “COINTELPRO operations” instead of mistakenly describing them as “organized stalking.” If we stop using the false “organized stalking” terminology and correctly describe our experience as the COINTELPRO operations of a federal agency, we will then be talking about government violation of our constitutional rights. COINTELPRO torture is government infliction of “cruel and unusual punishment” without due process of law. This is a clear and unquestionable violation of our constitutional rights even though it does not violate any criminal law. By thoroughly documenting evidence proving government agency violations of our constitutional rights through COINTELPRO operations, we clearly establish our right to obtain congressional investigation of these violations by a federal agency. By taking this approach, we have no need to prove that the operations violated any criminal law. One example of COINTELPRO operations that can only be performed by a federal agency is the interception and tampering with mail. An “organized stalking group cannot do this. Only a federal agency can do it. The Church Committee proved that USPS had illegally granted the FBI access to mail in 1940. Since 1940, the FBI has used this illegal access to our mail as a method of COINTELPRO harassment. Many times over the last 7 years, I have sent to TI's detailed explanations of how to document COINTELPRO evidence that can achieve this purpose. I will again send a copy of this explanation to anyone who requests it. If hundreds of TI's document proof of government responsibility for their COINTELPRO experiences, we will be making a powerful case for our right to congressional investigation of our experiences. However, I don't expect congress to voluntarily grant us this right. Congress knows about present COINTELPRO and covers it up. The past congressional investigations of COINTELPRO were forced upon congress by public pressure when TI's took their evidence to the public and created the public pressure which forced congress to undertake the two previous COINTELPRO investigations of 1976-78 and 1989. We must obtain congressional investigations of current COINTELPRO because this is our only possible means of accessing the classified evidence needed for successful litigation. We are prohibited by law from accessing and litigating government state secrets. Government agency COINTELPRO torture of citizens is TOP SECRET information that we are legally prohibited from reaching. Only congress has the power to access and expose these state secrets. When these state secrets are exposed by congressional investigation, as they have been twice in the past, the federal COINTELPRO agency can no longer claim the state secret privilege for these operations. Exposed secrets are no longer protected secrets. We will then have the evidence that we need to obtain legal representation on a contingency basis and to succeed with the litigation. The exposed COINTELPRO truth can be fully litigated using the evidence uncovered by congressional investigation and with the right to use legal discovery procedures to obtain further detailed evidence concerning the exposed secrets. TI's will be entitled to recover compensation for past harm, and we can seek legislation to provide adequate protection against future harm. There is no reason why the strategy that worked for TI's in producing the two past congressional investigations will not work for us now. The only reason that this strategy has not been used in the past 7 years is that Derrick and Eleanor have been blocking a solution to the true COINTELPRO problem by creating the false problem of “organized stalking.” Great success is possible with effective legal strategy. As recently as 2002, a jury in Oakland awarded to COINTELPRO targets Judi Bari and Darryl Cherney $4.4 million in damages for violations of their constitutional rights. The limited violations found by the jury were very mild compared to the COINTELPRO torture that TI's suffer for many years. There will be nothing but continuing failure as long as TI's continue to follow the lead of Anti-TI Activists like Derrick and Eleanor. These two infiltrators have worked systematically over the years to cover up the COINTELPRO truth with the “gang-stalking” myth. They have trained and conditioned TI's to defeat themselves and to deny their own constitutional rights by using “organized stalking” mythology to disguise COINTELPRO reality. TI's who have fallen for the “gang-stalking” strategy of self-defeat have been denying themselves the only real remedy for their true problem. I have explained this over and over to TI's, for 7 years, but they still keep following the Anti-TI Activists who lead them to follow strategies of certain failure. As hard as I've tried, I have not been able to persuade TI's to take responsibility for their own lives and for their own future by separating themselves from false and destructive leaders and by following the one and only strategy that can achieve an end to their torture. CONCLUSION: The bad news is that the “organized stalking” strategies of Derrick and Eleanor and their supporters will ensure continuing defeat as long as these strategies are followed by TI's who have been deceived into believing that they are entitled to investigation and prosecution of the non-criminal activity mistakenly described as “organized stalking.” The good news is that if TI's will stop following enemies disguised as friends and stop using the wrong terms and the wrong explanation for their COINTELPRO experiences, they can document evidence that will establish their right to congressional investigation of their true problem, and they can obtain the evidence needed for successful litigation to compensate them for past harm and to stop future harm. The bad news is that after 7 years of repeating this explanation to TI's who don't listen, it has been impossible for me to make them understand the fatal, fundamental mistake in legal strategy that the Anti-TI Activist leaders keep persuading them to make. The good news is that TI''s have the freedom to stop making this fatal, fundamental mistake at any time and to start working toward an achievable solution.  The choice has always been theirs.  A solution has always been possible.  And it still is. Bob S ***************************************************************** Related:  [AYT] If This Were a Dictatorship, the Authorities Would Have Told Us
  • 202: Third-Degree Masters and 202: Third-Degree Masters and "The Craft"

    Third Degree Masters and "the Craft"           The history behind the Wizard of Oz programming is interesting. It suggests that the Wizard of Oz has had an important part in the occult world all along. One of the secrets of the Mystery Religions, especially the Egyptian Isis mystery religion was the ability to use drugs and torture to create multiple personalities. The word Oz is known to have been used by its author as an abbreviation for Osirus. [...] These are serious hints that the occult world didn’t stop programming people with dissociative states and triggers when the ancient Egyptian empires fell. Instead of using modern lingo such as “hypnotize”, they would say “cast a spell.” Later in Freemasonry, the Right Worshipful Master would “charge” (meaning hypnotize) an initiate. The occultist Baum, a member of the Theosophical Society, was inspired by some spirit who gave him the “magic key” to write the Wizard of Oz book, which came out in 1900.  Excerpted from: The Wizard of Oz & Illuminati Mind Control (download PDF)          
  • 201: True Colors 201: True Colors

    Some light on the terms "red" and "blue" in freemasonry: You can choose the blue pill, or the red pill, it doesn't matter ... because "WE ARE ALL SOCIALISTS NOW." These colors are also used in maistream politics to signify "right-wing" (red) and "left-wing" (blue), even though both "wings" are controlled by the same bird brain.  In this context, the use of blue to represent the left-wing/Democrat/socialist viewpoint is inconsistent with the traditional association of the color red with socialism/communism.  Footnote: The First Time I Heard of Barack Obama by Tom Fife
  • 102: Wolves & Snakes 102: Wolves & Snakes

     "Wolves in Sheep's Clothing" 1) Fabian Society (credit: Jordan Maxwell) Prime Minister Tony Blair visits the Fabian Society of London. Notice that the Fabian Society's shield is a depiction of a "wolf in sheep's clothing."   In symbolic form, they are telling us who they really are.   Footnote: Fabian Socialism (end of Jordan Maxwell exhibit) 2) FreemasonsMasons also have to wear a very specific kind of "clothing:" According to the symbolism, masons must wear the proper "clothing." That clothing is lambskin. See: Mormonism's Parallells to Freemasonry Masons wear lambskin "clothing."  Lambskin or sheep's clothing is an "emblem of innocence." Masons and Fabian Socialists are trying to tell you something through a choice of symbolism which originates in the Bible itself: "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles? So, every sound tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears evil fruit." Matthew 7:15 "Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves. Beware of men; for they will deliver you up to councils, and flog you in their synagogues, and you will be dragged before governors and kings for My sake ..." Matthew 10:16   More on Google in my article State Action Doctrine and Intelligence Agency Dictatorship Part II: Control of Technology Below, two ancient Chinese gods bear the square & compass, which coincidentally are the quintessential symbols of modern freemasonry.  These gods appear to be human ... but if you look "just below the surface" (symbolically speaking) you will find that they are actually coiling serpents: The above source asserts that there is no connection between these Chinese societies and modern freemasonry. Regardless, serpents are by no means absent from the American masonic landscape:
  • 101: MKULTRA and the Masonic Lodge 101: MKULTRA and the Masonic Lodge

    (Click to download free e-book) The following 37-page essay contains some of the most interesting and important information you will ever read: An excerpt from the introduction to The Controllers: "... there is much more to the present day technology of mind control than mere hypnosis -- and many good reasons to suspect that UFO abduction accounts are an artifact of continuing brainwashing/behavior modification experiments. Moreover, I intend to demonstrate that, by using UFO mythology as a cover story, the experimenters may have solved the major problem with the work conducted in the 1950s -- "the disposal problem," i.e., the question of "What do we do with the victims?" If, in these pages, I seem to stray from the subject of the saucers, I plead for patience. Before I attempt to link UFO abductions with mind control experiments, I must first show that this technology EXISTS. Much of the forthcoming is an introduction to the topic of mind control -- what it is, and how it works. Click here to download THE CONTROLLERS in its entirety (37 pages) We don't want the public to know about this, so let's talk about something else instead: Video running time: 1 minute 30 seconds
  • 401: There is No Such Thing as a Mason (Lemons & Conclusions) 401: There is No Such Thing as a Mason (Lemons & Conclusions)

      Masonic laws tend to include provisions such as "once a mason, always a mason." This is to remind people who leave the lodge that although they are no longer members of the lodge, they still remain "masons" who are honor bound by an inescapable moral "obligation." This official masonic distinction between MEMBERSHIP in the organization and STATUS as a mason is important to understand. ... the candidate is advised that nothing he is about to promise will in any way interfere with any duty he owes to God, his country, his family/neighbor or himself. ... (copied from If a person takes an "obligation" based on such an assurance, and that assurance is fraudulent, then he is not obligated at all. Q: "What makes you a mason?" A: "My obligation."   If a person is not obligated, then he/she is not a mason, according to masonry itself. I was told by a Scottish Rite mason that "the only thing that matters is the obligation. All that other stuff about helping people etc., that's all bull****." In retrospect I think that is interesting, because since the assurance on which the obligation is based is fraudulent, therefore no one is actually obligated. Since status as a mason is determined solely by the condition of being obligated, there is no such thing as a mason. And if "everything else" is BS, I don't know what that tells you. There may be all kinds of folks that belong to masonic lodges, and participate in masonic rituals, but there is no such thing as a mason. The preceding series of research exhibits (numbered 101, 102 etc.)  is designed to demonstrate both 1) why the assurance is fraudulent and 2) turning to Christ Jesus is important.  
  • 301: Blood Debts and Human Sacrifice 301: Blood Debts and Human Sacrifice

    Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. Ephesians 5:11 Introduction Masonic organizations promote the idea that they are a force against religious extremism.   The mainstream freemasonry descending from the United Grand Lodge of England requires that its members profess a belief in Deity, but does not inquire further about the specific details of their religious beliefs.   The lodges make it known that this policy is designed to restrict membership to good and moral men who believe in God but come from different religious backgrounds, allowing them to join together in a spirit of fraternal harmony.   Most reasonable and rational men, opposed to religious extremism, find this concept appealing and naturally want to be a part of such an "open minded" organization. The lodges confer "degrees" of initiation on their members at ritual meetings.    During each conferral, the candidate is made to kneel at an altar and swear a blood oath whereby they promise to keep the secrets of the order, with violations beiing punishable by extreme physical mutilation.   These punishments, which vary in specifics with each degree, are explicitly and graphically described to the candidate before he is asked to take the oath.   The actual administration of the oath begins with an invocation of God.   A cursory review of official masonic documents reveals that the fundamental purpose of requiring members to profess a belief in Deity is not to ensure a membership of moral men.   Rather, it is in place to strengthen the psychological impact when the candidate kneels blindfolded at the altar and is made to take his blood oath.   It is to make the "obligation more binding."  Masonic organizations of the French "Grand Orient" stream omit the invocation of God, based on a stated policy that members should enjoy absolute freedom of conscience.   However, although both the British and Grand Orient masonic movements profess to be rational responses to religious extremism, the core elements of their rituals, particularly including the passwords of the degrees, are deeply rooted in the Bible itself.   In the lodge room, members are instructed to turn to the Holy Bible in order to best learn the secrets of their craft, and this is for good reason. They need not look far.  In the opening chapters of Genesis (the very first book of the Bible), they will come across a series of passages containing words that they will immediately recognize from their ritual and which contains the key that will unlock the primordial secret of the fraternity.     Therefore, even the non-religious reader must inquire into some arcane Biblical history if they wish to acquire an accurate understanding of the true nature of the masonic order.   The following graphical exhibits are presented with that end in view. The Hidden Roots of Freemasonry APOCALYPSIS MOSIS i 1 This is the story of Adam and Eve after they had gone out of Paradise. And Adam knew his wife 2 Eve and went upwards to the sun-rising and abode there eighteen years and two months. And 3 Eve conceived and bare two sons; Adiaphotos, who is called Cain and Amilabes who is called Abel. ii 1 And after this, Adam and Eve were with one another and while they were sleeping, Eve said to Adam her lord: 'My lord, Adam, behold, 2 I have seen in a dream this night the blood of my son Amilabes who is styled Abel being poured into the mouth of Cain his brother and he went on drinking it without pity. But he begged him to leave him a little of it. Yet he hearkened 3 not to him, but gulped down the whole; nor did it stay in his stomach, but came out of his mouth. And Adam said, 'Let us arise and go 4 and see what has happened to them. (I fear) lest the adversary may be assailing them somewhere.' iii 1 And they both went and found Abel murdered. I by the hand of Cain his brother. And God 2 saith to Michael the archangel: 'Say to Adam: " Reveal not the secret that thou knowest to Cain thy son, for he is a son of wrath. But grieve not, for I will give thee another son in his stead; he shall show (to thee) all that thou shalt do. Do thou tell him nothing."' Thus spake the archangel 3 to Adam. But he kept the word in his heart, and with him also Eve, though they grieved concerning Abel their son. iv 1 And after this, Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bare Seth. And Adam said to Eve: 'See! we have 2 begotten a son in place of Abel, whom Cain slew, let us give glory and sacrifice to God.' Genesis 4:17-22 About the Author Manly P. Hall (1901-1990), widely regarded as a sage and teacher steeped in the wisdom of antiquity, was one of the leading esoteric scholars of the twentieth century. The author of the landmark work The Secret Teachings of All Ages, Hall was named a 33° Mason in 1973. It is the highest rank Freemasonry can bestow. ( Blood as a Medium of Exchange After Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden, God clothed them with the skins of animals (Gen 3:21).   This is the first example in the Bible, right at the beginning, of the necessity of blood being shed for the redemption of sin.   In the New Testament, it is not just Jesus dying on the cross but more specifically his shedding of blood to redeem sin that is his gift to humanity. Examples in Popular Culture In this scene from the film "The Devil's Advocate" starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves, the African witch doctor tells Reeves' character to think of blood as "spiritual currency:" Video running time: 30 seconds Next, in this scene from In the film "Eyes Wide Shut," Tom Cruise's character has incurred a debt of blood by trespassing on the diabolical ritual of an elite cult.   He does not understand that there is some kind of dark or occult law at play in the situation, and he is only saved when one of the temple prostitutes offers herself as a human sacrifice to redeem his debt of blood.    Here is a clip of this important scene from the movie: Video running time: 4 minutes Excerpt from Fire & Ice by Stephen E. Flowers, Ph. D.   One of the most important, and certainly the most diabolically mysterious, of these shadowy lodges was the Free-Masonic Order of the Golden Centurium (FOGC). This order was supposedly founded in 1840 in Munich by some rich German industrialists and well-placed citizens.13 The FOGC was an openly daemonological order that maintained magical contact with a tetrad of daemons: Barzabel (planetary demonium of Mars), Astaroth, Belial, and Asmodeus. The service of these entities was to provide the initiates of the order with untold personal power, influence, and wealth. In essence the FOGC was a cult of human sacrifice. The centurium in its name is Latin for a group or division of one hundred. Actually, the number of initiates in the lodge was limited to ninety-nine—the one-hundredth member of the order was the demonium itself. Each year a new member was elected and initiated, so the extra human initiate had to be sacrificed to the demonium. This whole affair was taken care of on the night of the twenty-third of June, St. John's Day. On that night, the lodge members would convene, and if no brother had died in the course of the year, a "lodge sacrifice" had to be chosen. This was done by drawing lots. The initiate chosen for this honor would then drink a poison draught in order to complete the sacrificial act. Album artwork depicting Michael Jackson in red (symbolic of blood), standing atop masonic checkerboard pattern.   The image is superimposed by a portrait of Michael's killer Dr. Conrad Murray, clothed his masonic lodge officer's jewels. For further research on this subject, see: Freemasonry Resource Library at and



General Research

  • In 2021, Alex Jones & David Icke work to stumble true patriots by promoting legal disinformation

    This is an FYI to any Infowars / Alex Jones listeners.  Alex is now actively promoting CIA disinformation targeted at patriots in order to confuse them about the law: The disinformation, explained In the above link, David Icke is promoting an old disinformation meme that has been around for over a decade and was seen in the mid 2000's being promoted by other disinformation operatives including his old colleague Jordan Maxwell, with whom David associated at the Truth Seeker Company in San Diego. The core idea of the disinformation theme is that for every living breathing human being, the government has also created a corresponding corporation called a "straw man" in each person's name (using all capital letters) without telling anyone.  It says that government only has jurisdiction over the corporation, but not over the real person, allegedly because living human beings are only subject to the "common law."  By unknowling accepting the "straw man," people supposedly "contract" with the government, thus giving the government jurisdiction over them.  The underlying false idea that these people are promoting is that there are actually, secretly, two separate systems of  government -- the "common law" for natural people and the "statutory" law for corporations, and the government only has jurisdiction over corporations. The theme goes on to promote the idea that, once you become aware of and fully understand this state of affairs, you can "get out of the system" by "revoking your contract with the government" by taking various nonsensical actions (e.g., filing certain nonsensical paperwork with state agencies that administer the Uniform Commercial Code). The reality Govermnents have jurisdiction over both real people and corporations under long-established principles of law. They neither require nor request your individual consent. In the countries that trace their systems of law to Britain (e.g., USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India),  common and statutory law are NOT two independent systems of law, as these disinformation operatives hope to convince you, but rather they are both part of the SAME systems. Legislators make statutory law and judges make judge-made law, the latter being properly referred to as "common law." The United States Constitution clearly contemplates both. Any first-year law student can attest to that. We may not LIKE what the government is doing (in fact, in might be downright tyrannical), that does not mean that the government must lack jurisdiction based on some bizarre legal theory. It just means they're illegitimate based on common sense and man's natural, God-given rights.
  • C.I.A. Mind-Controlling Mass Shooters to Manufacture Public Consent for Gun Confiscation

    C.I.A. Mind-Controlling Mass Shooters to Manufacture Public Consent for Gun Confiscation

    You are living under a classified state of dictatorship by the C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies. They have deployed a standing army (1) (2) (3) (4) amongst the people, against which the framers had sought to protect us.155 years after Lincoln's "emancipation proclamation," large numbers of black people are still wearing the wrong kind of chains. (1) (2) (3) And now they are coming for your guns. YESTERDAY: U.S. police forces used specially-modified tanks to set ablaze the communal home of a dissident religious group in Waco, Texas (video). Residents attempting to flee from their burning home (and approximately half of whom were people of color) were machine-gunned to death by U.S. forces positioned outside the building exit (video). The CIA-controlled mass media then reported to the public that the residents were insane cult members who had committed mass suicide. Experts who studied this evidence at the time and eventually realized the truth wound up dead.  As the old saying goes, "dead men tell no tales."  More info at TODAY: The CIA-controlled mass media is employing psychological conditioning methods to convince you to willingly surrender your firearms to the state ... "because of mass shootings." If you don't surrender, then the CIA-controlled mass media will have to keep broadcasting images of terrorized children crying, until you finally give in. In reality, however, many of the perpetrators of the mass-publicized "gun violence" incidents turn out to be CIA mind control subjects (specifically including Nikolas Cruz, the Florida school schooter whose actions were immediately followed by the latest mass-media "propaganda blitz" for gun control in the USA, and also specifically including Nashville Waffle House shooter Travis Reinking). In still other cases, strong evidence exists that the mass shooters are themselves members of, or acting under the influence of, intelligence agency-sponsored cults and fraternities (details below). The CIA is engineering many of these horrifying events in order to artificially manufacture consent on the part of the public for gun confiscation in the United States. As Mrs. Virginia Thomas, the wife of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, correctly noted, history teaches us that gun confiscation is a necessary prelude to genocide, and the current "youth movement" against guns is organized by entrenched political powers, not by the duped kids that the CIA-controlled mass media shows us on TV.  Eventually, they expect us all to settle for restrictions on gun ownership by those with "mental health" issues - but the CIA-controlled psychiatric profession has preemptively defined mental illness in such a way as to include symptoms likely to be reported by mind control subjects and other dissidents  (see Weaponized Psychiatry). "[P]ower and its minions are the same in all countries and in all ages. It marks its victim; denounces it; and excites the public odium and the public hatred, to conceal its own abuses and encroachments."  Senator Henry Clay, in a speech to the United States Senate, March 14, 1834. IMPORTANT NOTICE AND PRAYER FOR THE PEOPLE OF NEW ZEALAND New Zealand mass-shooter Brenton Tarrant stated in his "manifesto" that he acted with the blessing of the "brother knights" (importantly, note his use of the plural) of the Knights Templar (a C.I.A.-organized higher-level masonic order and drug cartel) (1) (2). Tarrant's prime inspiration, Norweigan mass-shooter Anders Breivik, was himself a member. The global intelligence agency dictatorship is sponsoring most all of the mass shootings that have been making headlines internationally in recent years. Then, as predictably as clockwork, their covertly-controlled "private" media networks tell the public to turn in their firearms.  Your police, judges and legislators are overwhelmingly members, and on board with the program.  Their bosses print the money for every country and sponsor expensive childrens' hospitals as public relations (P.R.) to convince the public that they are just a social club made up of wonderful philanthropic guys. But their own choice of costumes betray them:  they are the wolves, and you are the sheep. IF YOU TURN IN YOUR FIREARMS, YOU ARE TURNING THEM IN TO THE VERY PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE BLOODY MASS SHOOTINGS, AND THE BLOOD IS ON YOUR HANDS AS WELL, AND ON THE HANDS OF EVERYONE WHO GOES ALONG WITH THIS. MAY GOD DAMN THE PEOPLE OF NEW ZEALAND FOR THEIR COWARDLY SUBMISSION TO THESE C.I.A. MASS MURDERERS AND THEIR CIVILIAN DISARMAMENT PROGRAM. AND MAY GOD DAMN THE AMERICANS WHO DON'T SPEAK OUT NOW WHILE THEY STILL CAN. DOING NOTHING AND SAYING NOTHING IS JUST AS BAD AS BEING AN ACTIVE COLLABORATOR. Today, the leaders of American police seem like they should be wearing British uniforms, not American ... These guys definitely agree with their American brethren ... THESE GUYS DON'T THINK ABOUT RIGHT OR WRONG. THESE GUYS DO EXACTLY WHAT THEY'RE TOLD. And "your" politicians are fine with THESE guys having guns -- but NOT YOU.  So the question is: do YOU trust THESE GUYS to only use those guns to in ways that protect YOUR freedom and YOUR family? Do you believe that THESE GUYS will be there to protect YOUR loved ones at the moment an armed attacker threatens them? And, far more importantly, are you confident that THESE GUYS won't be the ones someday be pointing THEIR GUNS at you or YOUR family? By what right or authority does any other mortal human being decide that THESE GUYS should be armed, and YOU should be disarmed? Did you know that European countries have already begun, on an introductory basis, to allow Chinese troops to police their cities? Footnote: Worst genocides of the 20th and 21st centuries
  • State Action Doctrine and Intelligence Agency Dictatorship Part II: Covert State Control of Technological Progress

    State Action Doctrine and Intelligence Agency Dictatorship Part II: Covert State Control of Technological Progress

      Who controls your technology?  Intel. Click here or on the image above for more information about the Intel "Management Engine." For many years, Andrew Tannenbaum (the author of the MINIX operating system) was not aware that that his creation had been secretly snuck into millions of Intel processors. Click here to view the "open letter" which he wrote to Intel after finding out about it. Some readers of Slashdot, a popular tech news website, also had some interesting comments about this story: Who controls your technology?  AMD. The corporate logos of other major chip-makers also signal their true identities. AMD, one of the three major CPU manufactures (along with Intel and Apple), uses a stylized freemasonic square and compass as their logo. Compare the AMD vs masonic logo:   NVIDIA, who makes the graphics chips, uses the freemasonic Eye of Horus: Click to read the ful article: "Is It Time For Open Processors?" Who controls your technology?  Alphabet.      That's what I call ... ... or, in other words, Meaningful private competition will not be permitted, when the state is in control:   At the same time, extreme "leftist" organizations are complaining that Google is censoring them as well: Video running time: Approx. 10 minutes ; They'll censor anyone, especialy activists, who are a thorn in their side.  "Left-wing" or "right-wing" labels don't matter and are themselves disinformation concepts in a very real way.  The whole point of this article is to suggest that Google shouldn't be censoring anyone, since it is in every meaningful way an arm of the state. It's legal status as a "private corporation" is simply a smokescreen designed to conceal this fact from the general public.  I suggest that the citizenry needs to be made to catch on and raise a huge ruckus about this sort of thing.  It warms my heart to see how Google and Moscow are walking hand-in-hand when it comes to "delisting" websites so that nobody can find out about them any more.  The right of all people to free speech and  communication must yield to the rights of state-controlled megacorporations to lock down the communications infrastructure so that we only have access to officially-sanctioned content, mostly in the form of brain-dead "entertainment" and "news" programs.  We are told that we need to fight "piracy" (a scary word, conjuring up images of mauraders on the high seas) and the only way to do that is by shutting down (and deleting any references to) these evil "pirate" websites.  What they're not telling you is that the free and open technogical systems that make so-called "piracy" possible are the same ones that enable people to communicate freely over the internet, sharing mass amounts of data, without being shepherded into using state-controlled -- and censored -- platforms such as Google and YouTube. Recommended reading: Google: The New Censorship Who controls your technology?  Apple. Who controls your technology?  Microsoft. Many years ago, I came across an article that discussed how Windows XP (the extremely-popular operating system released by Microsoft in August 2001) was designed from the ground up to spread user data all over the hard disk drive, and in numerous ways to generate all kinds of forensic evidence about what a user had done with their computer. If anyone can find a copy of that article, please send it over to me using the "Contact" link at the top of the page. Will the free software movement (e.g. GNU/Linux) set us free? "Don't count on it!" During the last decade or two, a small (but significant) number of people, particularly those with greater-than-average computer skills, abandoned their expensive Macs and/or the in-your-face spying of Microsoft Windows 10, and began switching to the various "distributions" of the freely available Linux computer operating system. The licensing structure of this "free software" movement tends towards the creation of a vast culture of free software from which more and more people over time can benefit -- at least in theory.  Obviously, this is something that powerful interests have worked from behind the scenes to keep under control: Click here to read entire article: "Julian Assange: Debian is Owned by the NSA" Personally, I'm hoping that those Italian guys behind the Devuan project (a version of Linux without the "systemd" problem discussed in the preceding news clippings) find success, but I'm not holding my breath. The freedom made possible by free software poses a threat to political powers that seek to control civilian populations.  They, in response, predictably will oppose its use, and today seek to do so by convincing the public that freedom is evil and that, at least when it comes to technology, the only people who would want to use free and open software systems are communists and terrorists!  To further this objective, loyal collaborator-minions have been placed into key positions throughout the free software movement and have already begun to dutifully carry out this important agenda. For example, the Mozilla Foundation -- a key bastion of the free software movement and maker of the popular Firefox web browser -- is already working to sabatoge the movement from within by literally associating itself with communist- and terrorist-associated organizations: When the general public begins to hear more and more stories like this one, they will be ever-more-strongly convinced that they ought to keep using the proprietary (but familiar) computing systems from the likes of Microsoft, Google, and Apple. Which all spy on you 100% on the time, ostensibly "legally" -- because your mere use of their software indicates your "consent" to such monitoring.  Mozilla is also hoping you'll place your trust in them to identify "misinformation" on the web: As I said above, however (in the context of Google doing the same thing), I say again: consider the source. Who, exactly, is so concerned nowadays about "helping" the general public to "fight misinformation?"  What we are witnessing is the covert takeover by the state of all private entities who have any meaningful influence. In December 2017, Mozilla began automatically slipping new plug-in software into newer versions of its Firefox browser, which users would automatically receive when the browser updated.  One observer on a tech-focused discussion forum commented: The existential reality here is that you don't have a meaningful choice when it comes to technology (or media, for that matter, as is covered elewhere on this site). They're all covertly controlled by the state, and they have a de facto monopoly.  The appearance of our having a few "choices" (i.e., Google vs. Firefox -- or Apple vs. Microsoft -- or CNN vs. MSNBC) are simply illusions designed to lead the civilian population into believing that they still live in a "democracy" or other such nonsense, where meaningful freedom of choice and private competition still exists in these key areas.   The maintenance of such a facade is an age-old tactic used by military forces to pacify conquered populations. As Machiavelli wrote over five centuries ago in The Prince, "[w]henever those states which have been acquired [...] have been accustomed to live under their own laws and in freedom [..., then continue to] permit them to live under their own laws, drawing a tribute, and establishing within it an oligarchy which will keep it friendly to you."   In the modern-day conquered western world, they maintain the appearance of allowing us to continue to live not only "under our own laws," but also to have freedom of choice when it comes to media and technology.   But it's all the same sort of lie ... the same sort of magic trick illusion.   Today, it's just done on such a grand scale that most people cannot fathom what is in fact happening. Dr. Richard Stallman, one of the founders of the free software movement, made the following remarks about the vanishing state of privacy in the modern world: Click here to read the entire interview with Stallman. Official promo video for Dashlane password management service shows user with "007" e-mail address: You think you're dealing with "private" parties, but everywhere you turn nowadays, there is more covert state action. October 2018: Facebook censoring foreign disinformation That's great news!  I'm so glad that Facebook is protecting me from seeing the disinformation sponsored by Iran.  But I'm even more looking forward to the day when they start censoring the disinformation sponsored by my OWN government. Maybe they'll get around to that soon.  Nah ... Oh, and now in February 2019, it looks like the European Union has decided that is joining the Orwellian Global Censorship System ... oops, I mean the World Government Prior Restraint of Disallowed Communications Grid ... no wait, I mean the Noble Fight Against "Piracy." Yeah, that's it! Don't get upset though, because it wouldn't be a GLOBAL dictatorship without EU participation, now would it? Anyway, for more information on the sickening totalitarianism being imposed on the nations of Europe please see my separate research exhibit entitled The European Union's War on Democracy. The following article is also required reading: Click to read "The Coming War on General Computation" A wise comment on the nature of the internet: Related: State Action Doctrine and Intelligence Agency Dictatorship Part I: Pushing the Envelope in Controlled Media
  • Slavery Consummated by Physical Rape

    Slavery Consummated by Physical Rape

        Another woman forcibly subjected to body cavity search in back of police car Video running time:  3 minutes Breaking a Horse in Three Days Video running time: 4 minutes
  • - What America's State-Controlled Press Didn't Tell You About the Branch Davidian Massacre - What America's State-Controlled Press Didn't Tell You About the Branch Davidian Massacre In an act of symbolic revenge for the April 19, 1775 battles of Lexington and Concord which instigated the American Revolution, the decision-makers in the United States government in 1993 perpetrated a holocaust of God-fearing, independence-minded Americans, on the anniversary of those opening battles of the war for independence.  This page presents the facts about this modern-day American holocaust and its cover-up by the C.I.A.-controlled "mainstream media."  Let's get started. Here is an still image of a U.S. Bradley tank shooting fire into the Branch Davidian communal home in Waco, Texas back in 1993: The image is a still shot from the documentary film Waco: The Big Lie (YouTube)  (download).  Here is a short excerpt showing the tank start the fire:  Video running time approx. 1 minute The C.I.A.-controlled American press responded to this footage with overwhelming silence, except in the case of its print publication The Washington Post, which responded with a despicable hit-piece authored by Jason Vest (who is described by his current employer as an "intelligence specialist") demonizing the filmmaker as a crazy conspiracy theorist who had mischaracterized reflections of sunlight as flames in order to stir up anti-government sentiment. You have seen the video; decide for yourself what the footage shows.  Notably, the government separately attempted to use the same excuse ("sunlight reflections") to explain away its own infra-red helicopter footage that showed agents machine-gunning the building exit during the fire. We'll get to that farther down the page. But for now, here is another image of the tank shooting fire into the Davidian home: The image above is a video still clipped from the documentary film American: The Bill Hicks Story.  The image is clearer and easier to see in the actual video footage shown in the player below. Watch the video, then continue on. Video running time:  3 minutes 22 seconds Bill Hicks was quite the joker, wasn't he?  It sure is a pity that he died when he was only 32 years old.  But lots of people die of cancer in their early thirties, right? Stephen Knight, for example.  Nothing to worry about. Video running time: 15 seconds  During the standoff, the FBI/ATF utilized psychological warfare techniques in an effort to convince the remaining Davidians to leave the property. One of these techniques involved blaring loud noises at the house day and night, such as recordings of animals being slaughtered, and the Nancy Sinatra song "These Boots are Made for Walking."  Notably, the lyrics to the song included the following lyrics: "I just found me a brand new box of matches, and if you play with fire, you know you're gonna get burned" (emphasis added). Anyway, if you want to learn what really happened in Waco, Texas, that the state-controlled American media never told you, then you need to watch this must-see documentary by William Gazecki: Video running time:  2 hours 15 minutes This whole documentary is required viewing for everyone. If you absolutely can't make time to watch the entire film, then just skip ahead and start watching from just before the one hour, fifty-nine minute (01:58:37) mark, for Dr. Edward Allard's expert analysis of the FLIR (infra-red) video footage taken from the US helicopter -- including his conclusion that government forces machine-gunned the Davidians who were trying to flee from the burning building. Of course, if Dr. Allard had known what was good for him, he wouldn't have run his mouth: "Local" Cops Keep the Press Away  ATF Flag Raised On Site As Symbol of Military Conquest A few Davidians survived ... Watch the "Rules of Engagement" documentary above. It's very important and you will not view this incident the same way after seeing it.  This was not a bunch of crazy cult members committing mass suicide like the state-controlled American press reported. This was a deliberate massacre of American citizens perpertrated by the federal government. C.I.A. Psychological Warfare in 2018: The Demonization of the Davidians Continues 25 Years Later In early 2018, A&E produced a documentary TV program about the Davidians entitled "Waco: Madman or Messiah?"  This choice of title appears to have been carefully chosen for its psychological effect:  virtually everyone will subconsciously reject the idea that Koresh was a "messiah," and as a result subconsciously conclude that he therefore must obviously have been a madman -- since that was the only other of the two choices presented. This is an example of propaganda and applied psychology in action (for more on this point, see: How Emotions Affect Logical Reasoning.) Like other dictatorships throughout history, the United States of America has a state-controlled press.  What makes ours all the more sinister, however, is that here in the USA, the state control is kept secret - it's done by the CIA or other intelligence services through countless proxy "private" corporations that the public is led to believe are not state agencies, which they in fact actually are.  Each of the hundreds of television channels displays a "network logo" at the bottom right corner of the screen, reinforcing the appearance that each is a separate business entity of some sort. In reality, today, virtually all mass media has been coopted by the state. The "independent business" entities are simply maintained to deceive the public into believing in the myth of a free press (a key disinformation theme), and also to allow the intelligence agencies to act in any manner they please without implicating the Constitutional doctrine of "state action." (1) (2) (3) (4) Twenty-five years after the massacre, we still don't see the videos shown earlier in this article (much less, the complete Branch Davidian home movies made during the siege) (1) (2) on the "mainstream" TV shown to the public.  Ask yourself why. In Memory of the Victims Died February 28, 1993 Winston Blake, 28, black, British Peter Gent, 24, white, Australian Peter Hipsman, 28, white, American Perry Jones, 64, white, American Michael Schroeder, 29, white, American Jaydean Wendell, 34, Hawaiian, American Died April 19, 1993 Katherine Andrade, 24, white, American Chanel Andrade, 1, white, American Jennifer Andrade, 19, white, American George Bennett, 35, black, British Susan Benta, 31, black, British Mary Jean Borst, 49, white, American Pablo Cohen, 38, white, Israeli Abedowalo Davies, 30, black, British Shari Doyle, 18, white, American Beverly Elliot, 30, black, British Yvette Fagan, 32, black, British Doris Fagan, 51, black, British Lisa Marie Farris, 24, white, American Raymond Friesen, 76, white, Canadian Sandra Hardial, 27, black, British Zilla Henry, 55, black, British Vanessa Henry, 19, black, British Phillip Henry, 22, black, British Paulina Henry, 24, black, British Stephen Henry, 26, black, British Diana Henry, 28, black, British Novellette Hipsman, 36, black, Canadian Floyd Houtman, 61, black, American Sherri Jewell, 43, Asian, American David M. Jones, 38, white, American David Koresh, 33, white, American Rachel Koresh, 24, white, American Cyrus Koresh, 8, white, American Star Koresh, 6, white, American Bobbie Lane Koresh, 2, white, American Jeffery Little, 32, white, American Nicole Gent Little, 24, white, Australian   and unborn child Dayland Gent, 3, white, American Page Gent, 1, white, American Livingston Malcolm, 26, black, British Diane Martin, 41, black, British Wayne Martin, Sr., 42, black, American Lisa Martin, 13, black, American Sheila Martin, Jr., 15, black, American Anita Martin, 18, black, American Wayne Martin, Jr., 20, black, American Julliete Martinez, 30, Mexican American Crystal Martinez, 3, Mexican American Isaiah Martinez, 4, Mexican American Joseph Martinez, 8, Mexican American Abigail Martinez, 11, Mexican American Audrey Martinez, 13, Mexican American John-Mark McBean, 27, black, British Bernadette Monbelly, 31, black, British Rosemary Morrison, 29, black, British Melissa Morrison, 6, black, British Sonia Murray, 29, black, American Theresa Nobrega, 48, black, British James Riddle, 32, white, American Rebecca Saipaia, 24, Asian, Phillipino Steve Schneider, 43, white, American Judy Schneider, 41, white, American Mayanah Schneider, 2, white, American Clifford Sellors, 33, white, British Scott Kojiro Sonobe, 35, Asian, American Floracita Sonobe, 34, Asian, Phillipino Gregory Summers, 28, white, American Aisha Gyrfas Summers, 17, white, Australian    and unborn child Startle Summers, 1, white, American Lorraine Sylvia, 40, white, American Rachel Sylvia, 12, white, American Hollywood Sylvia, 1, white, American Michelle Jones Thibodeau, 18, white, American Serenity Jones, 4, white, American Chica Jones, 2, white, American Little One Jones, 2, white, American Neal Vaega, 38, Somoan, New Zealander Margarida Vaega, 47, Asian, New Zealander Mark H. Wendell, 40, Asian, American Memorial markers at Mount Carmel center today: Note: Several of the following images of memorial markers to the murdered Davidians are high-resolution photos which have been shrunk to fit your screen.  You can save or view the full-size versions by right-clicking on it (or using whatever other browser controls you have available).   Recommended further research: "Waco: A New Revelation (Both Spiritual and Political)" by Charles Pace (one of the local community members), including information about apparent participation by the US Army Delta Force in the siege. Make sure to scroll down and check out some of the videos embedded on this page. The above link and associated video presentation is not to be confused with the 1999 documentary film of the same name: "Waco: A New Revelation" (1999 documentary film) FLIR Analysis by Edward Allard, Ph.D. My typing from a photocopy in my possession -- Richard J. Sanford    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Civil Action No. H-95-587 Judge Atlas DEBORAH BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants DECLARATION OF EDWARD F. ALLARD, PhD. Edward F. Allard declares and states as follows: 1. My name is Edward F. Allard. I have worked for many years in the field of radiation physics related to thermal imaging, thermal signatures, thermal suppression and especially in aspects of those subjects relating to Forward Looking Infrared [FLIR] military systems. 2. My experience is set forth in my curriculum vitae, which is attached to this declaration. I received my Bachelor of Science in physics from Boston College and my doctorate in physics from the University of Missouri. I hold Patent No. 4,413,668 on a device to suppress thermal signatures and Patent no. 5,013,092 on a microdischarge image intensifier. My inventions and studies will enable use of uncooled thermal imagers with predicted performance better than the current TOW antitank missile night sight; design and calculation for these required an expert knowledge of photocathodes, photo detectors, signal detection, noise, charge transfer and optics for thermal imaging devices. 3. I began my career in this field as a supervisor at the Defense Department's Night Vision Laboratory, later becoming Deputy Director, Systems Development. My team developed and defended a variety of programs in the area, including L3TV systems, the thermal night sight for the Dragon antitank weapon, the night sight for the TOW antitank missile system, and other programs. NVL pioneered the Common Module System that is the foundation of the thermal imaging systems used in Operation Desert Storm. 4. As a defense contractor and government employee, I have analyzed a number of thermal imaging devices. These include comparisons of L3TV with thermal imagers, comparisons of American and foreign imagers, analyses of the thermal imager for the M1 tank, design of thermal pointing systems, construction of a T-62 thermal target for tank gunnery, and countermeasures to completely hide an M60 tank from enemy FLIR and to reduce FLIR signatures of tents, trucks, ships, and individual soldiers. The interpretation of FLIR imagery requires skill and experience. As but a few examples, materials which reflect sunlight and thus seem bright in the visible spectrum will often appear indistinct, or even dark, to a thermal imager; the very reflective properties that make them bright to the eye make them appear cool, and thus dark, to FLIR systems. Interpretation of thermal images requires a knowledge of the reflective properties of both natural and man-made objects. 5. I have reviewed a FLIR tape depicting the events outside Waco, Texas, on April 19, 1993, which tape was obtained from one of the defense attorneys involved in the criminal cases that arose out of those events. My analysis of the tape follows. All times given are those shown in the timeclock shown in the tape. All directions are given from the standpoint of the viewer. 6. At 11:24:31, the FLIR is recording events in the rear of the building, where the Combat Engineering Vehicle [CEV] has partially demolished the area known as the "gymnasium." The FLIR shows several flashes appearing from a point to the left of the CEV. These are elongated in shape, several feet long, and appear and disappear at a regular rate with regular spacing between them. I note five flashes from one point, appearing and disappearing at the rate of 7-10 per second. At this location some non-flashing movement also appears visible. There is no natural explanation for these flashes. Natural phenomena do not heat and cool in fractions of a second. My expert opinion is that these flashes appear to be the muzzle flashes of a fully-automatic firearm, firing at about 500 rounds per minute cyclic rate. Carefully examined, in slow motion and by frame-to-frame observation, the flashes originate to the left and progress to the right, indicating that they are being fired from a source outside the building, and fired into the building. 7. At 11:42:56, the aircraft bearing the FLIR is circling the side of the building. A hot image is visible inside the side, ground floor, window of the "corner tower." As the aircraft continues its movement the image vanishes, underscoring the fact that the image is a hot object inside the room, the sight of which is lost as the aircraft moves on and alters the perspective through the window. 8. At 11:44:52, a momentary flash of radiation is seen to the rear of the central "tower." This may be at a location in the open area to the immediate rear of the building. The flash is visible for ten frames, approximately a third of a second, much longer than the flashes described above. It is not possible with these data to determine the cause or source of the flash. 9. At 11:47:50, the FLIR is recording events at the front of the building. A CEV has driven into the building, withdrawn, and has a large piece of rubble lodged on the front of the vehicle. An individual is dimly visible exiting the vehicle, walking to its front, and dislodging the rubble. The CEV is at this point halted within a vehicle length, perhaps twenty feet, of the front of the building. 10. At 12:07:40-42, the aircraft bearing the FLIR is circling past the right tower. A heat source, long and narrow in form, quickly appears across a window of the tower. Upon careful examination, slow motion and frame-by- frame, I believe this is more likely to be a heat source outside the window, than one inside it. It is noteworthy that the image does not vanish or fade as the aircraft flies past, in contrast to the heat signature noted at 11:42:56. 11. At 12:08:32, the FLIR depicts events at the rear of the building, where the large "gymnasium" structure has largely been demolished. Two very bright thermal flashes are visible near to or in the window at the center, in front of and to one side of the CEV which is stopped there. I see no natural explanation for these flashes. They would not, for instance, be reflections of sunlight off glass. 12. At 12:08:52 there are again radiation flashes, which I believe to be firearms fire, from the side and rear of the CEV. Again, when carefully examined they appear to move in the direction of the building. 13. In brief, my examination of the FLIR tape indicates: a. An analysis of the tape, field by field, reveals thermal flashes occurring that have pulse times and time intervals between them consistent with the intervals of automatic weapons fire. Pulses of approximately 1/15 second occur. There are no naturally- occurring phenomena that could explain these events. b. Other thermal flashes of radiation, approximately 1/3 second in duration, occur in various areas of the building complex. Again, no naturally-occurring phenomena can explain this. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Edward F. Allard, Phd. Dated this 1 day of Feb, 1996. For more information about the cult religious significance of holocausts (mass murder by fire), please see my companion article Freemasonry 301: Blood Debts & Human Sacrifice. Also, be sure and check out survivor David Thibodeau's website at   You can access this page directly at:
  • The Price We Pay For Oil

    The Price We Pay For Oil

      Documentary film: "Who Killed the Electric Car?"
  • Slow Surrender by US and EU Governments to Beijing Continues Unabated

    Slow Surrender by US and EU Governments to Beijing Continues Unabated

    The United States has quietly begun the process of surrendering control of domestic American infrastructure to Beijing via Chinese state-owned proxy corporations. Video running time: 3 minutes 10/28/2017 note: the above video was removed from YouTube without warning after this article was first published.   American freemasons and other insiders have been "let in on the secret" that we have been sold out to communist China.   It's good "inside info" so they all go along with it. By definition and nature, goverment is a monopoly on power and the use of force.  The only legitimate form of government is one which secures the rights of all men, which are endowed to them by their Creator.   This principle has been codified in the US Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights, but applies to all human beings regardless of geographic location. Western governments and that of China today respect absolutely ZERO human rights of anyone.   They get American dupes to buy into this treason by pointing out the obvious corruptions and abuses of the mega-corporations, then present communism as though it is some kind of solution.  But anyone who has done any research knows that the same international banking syndicates control both "capitalism" and "communism."    Any apparent "differences" between the two are only on the surface.     Further information on this subject from Texe Marrs here. CNOOC closes $15.1 billion acquisition of Canada's Nexen By Euan Rocha TORONTO | Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:36pm GMT TORONTO (Reuters) - The contentious $15.1 billion takeover of Canadian oil and gas company Nexen Inc(NXY.TO) by Chinese state-owned entity CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK) closed on Monday, more than seven monthsaf ter China's largest-ever f oreign takeover was announced. The following image is a still taken from the remake of Red Dawn, BEFORE all references to China were removed: If you thought Adolph Hitler was a great guy, then you're going to love the fellow who founded the present government of China: General Motors Finances and Promotes Chinese Communist Party The vast majority of American cars used to be made by proud American workers in America's "MOTOR CITY," Detroit Michigan. Mass genocide on a scale unprecedented and unequaled in human history ... that's how modern China got started.  Today, it is Chinese slaves who are now manufacturing many of the goods we all buy on a regular basis.  The United States of America is being systematically destroyed from within.        Why do America's Black Leaders Remain Silent? Footnote: The First Time I Heard of Barack Obama by Tom Fife
  • State Action Doctrine and Intelligence Agency Dictatorship Part I:

    State Action Doctrine and Intelligence Agency Dictatorship Part I: "Pushing the Envelope" in State-Controlled Media

    Introduction The C.I.A.-controlled news media is the enemy of the American (and all freedom-loving) people.  This includes not only the "mainstream" news networks like CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News, but also NewsMax and many seemingly "independent" news outlets on the internet.  This article starts with a few "Video Exhibits" showing you in painful detail how the TV news anchors are really just script readers who put no independent thought into anything they are saying (and thus why you would be a fool to listen to them, let alone believe anything they say).  The videos are following by a series of clippings from law journals and news articles which will teach you why this state of affairs is not just undesirable, but is also violative of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, despite fact that these news agencies appear to be "private" entities. But beyond that, they are engaged in military psychological warfare operations against us, and need to be treated accordingly.  Let's go! Video Exhibit A: "This is Very Dangerous To Our Democracy" Here is a clip of dozens of "journalists" from local TV stations around the country reading the exact same script, obviously oblivious to the frightening irony of their own statements: Video running time: just over 1 minute Video Exhibit B: Conan O'Brien is "Pushing the Envelope on Gay Marriage" In this clip from The Conan O'Brien Show, we see how literally dozens of television news presenters read from the exact same script when reporting on a story about gay marriage laws. Video running time: 3 minutes Video Exhibit C: Rising Gas Prices Conan also provided another example of many different "reporters" reading from the EXACT SAME script, this time about rising gas prices.  As you watch these videos, ask yourself: is this supposed to be funny?  If so, to whom? Video running time: 1 min 22 seconds What is really going on here is that our controllers, the guys behind-the-scenes who run the intelligence agencies of "our" government, are literally throwing their covert control of the "mainstream media" in our faces. They are putting it right out there on a major talk show, as plain as day, making it crystal clear that all of these so-called "journalists" that they show us on TV are all just a bunch of paid parrots, doing what they're told, getting paid to read from scripts that someone else has given them. And  of course the general public doesn't catch on, continuing to chew their cud (e.g., TV, Netflix, other mainstream "news" services), so maybe they really are no better than the cattle which our leaders view them as. What is really going on here is that our controllers, the guys behind-the-scenes who run the intelligence agencies of "our" government, are literally throwing their covert control of the "mainstream media" in our faces. They are putting it right out there on a major talk show, as plain as day, making it crystal clear that all of these so-called "journalists" that they show us on TV are all just a bunch of paid parrots, doing what they're told, getting paid to read from scripts that someone else has given them. And  of course the general public doesn't catch on, continuing to chew their cud (e.g., TV, Netflix, other mainstream "news" services), so maybe they really are no better than the cattle which our leaders view them as. Exhibit D: Research Clippings From Law Journals And Independent Media Showing Why The Controlled Media Violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution     As P.T. Barnum stated, "there's a sucker born every minute." IMPORTANT: SEE ALSO Mind Control 201 - Brain Implant Bloopers (live news feeds in which television reporters experience apparent neurological malfunctions) British Newspapers Challenge New Press RulesBy STEPHEN CASTLE and ALAN COWELLPublished March 19, 2013 LONDON — A day after British lawmakers agreed to ground rules for a new press code, an array of newspapers protested on Tuesday against the attempt to impose stricter curbs on this country’s scoop-driven dailies following the phone hacking scandal that convulsed Rupert Murdoch’s media empire and much of British public life.  In a statement, the newspaper society representing 1,100 newspapers said provisions for fines of up to $1.5 million on errant newspapers would impose a “crippling burden” on cash-strapped publications struggling against the inroads of the Internet. “A free press cannot be free if it is dependent on and accountable to a regulatory body recognized by the state," the president of the society, Adrian Jeakings, said. Indeed, the conservative Daily Mail commented in an editorial, “The bitter irony is this long-drawn out debate comes when the Internet — which, being global, has no regulatory restraints — is driving newspapers out of business.” “If politicians had devoted half as much of their energies to keeping a dying industry alive, instead of hammering another nail into its coffin, democracy would be in a healthier state today.” Newspaper proprietors and editors have not so far signed on to the agreement announced on Monday and say they were excluded from late-night cross-party talks on the new code while privacy campaigners clamoring for tighter press controls took part in the deliberations. Some indicated on Tuesday that they would not be rushed into responding to the proposed restrictions. “We need to go back a long way — to 1695, and the abolition of the newspaper licensing laws — to find a time when the press has been subject to statutory regulation. Last night, Parliament decided that 318 years was long enough to let newspapers and magazines remain beyond its influence, and agreed a set of measures that will involve the state, albeit tangentially, in their governance,” the conservative Daily Telegraph said. Lawmakers on Monday “urged the newspaper industry to endorse the new dispensation as quickly as possible,” the newspaper said. “However, after 318 years of a free press, its detail deserves careful consideration.” The agreement announced Monday creates a system under which erring newspapers will face big fines and come up against a tougher press regulator with new powers to investigate abuses and order prominent corrections in publications that breach standards. The deal, struck in the early hours of Monday, enshrines the powers of the regulator in a royal charter — the same document that sets out the rules and responsibilities of the British Broadcasting Corporation and the Bank of England. That ended a fierce dispute, which divided the coalition government, over whether new powers should instead be written into law. The idea of legislation raised alarms among those cherishing three centuries of broad peacetime freedom for Britain’s newspapers. They included Prime Minister David Cameron, who said a law establishing a press watchdog would cross a Rubicon — Caesar’s point of no return — toward government control because it could be amended to be even stricter by future governments that might want to curb the press. Source: Media Coverage of Trayvon Martin Case "The Lynching" (Clip from Afterburner with Bill Whittle) Video running time: Ten minutes
  • Militarization of Formerly Civilian Society

    Militarization of Formerly Civilian Society

            . .     Retired Marine Colonel Warns that US Military is "Attaching" US Police Departments Video running time: 3 minutes Video running time: 4 minutes Hmm, this reminds me of another "homeland security" proclamation from two and a half centuries ago . . . one that also warned of the danger posed by "sovereign citizen extremists": Further reading: George III on How Not to Handle a Crisis Excerpt from: The Biggest Threat to American Liberty by Jacob G. Hornberger March 31, 2015 [...] Perhaps it would be wise to review America’s founding principles regarding overgrown military establishments and the threat they pose to the liberty of the citizenry, in addition, that is, to the sentiments against overgrown military establishments expressed by America’s first president, George Washington: James Madison: “A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defence agst. foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home. Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a war, whenever a revolt was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the armies kept up under the pretext of defending, have enslaved the people.” Patrick Henry: “A standing army we shall have, also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny; and how are you to punish them? Will you order them to be punished? Who shall obey these orders? Will your mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment?” Henry St. George Tucker in Blackstone’s 1768 Commentaries on the Laws of England: “Wherever standing armies are kept up, and when the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.” Commonwealth of Virginia in 1788: “… that standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, and therefore ought to be avoided, as far as the circumstances and protection of the community will admit; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power.” Pennsylvania Convention: “… as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military shall be kept under strict subordination to and be governed by the civil power.” U.S. State Department website: “Wrenching memories of the Old World lingered in the 13 original English colonies along the eastern seaboard of North America, giving rise to deep opposition to the maintenance of a standing army in time of peace. All too often the standing armies of Europe were regarded as, at best, a rationale for imposing high taxes, and, at worst, a means to control the civilian population and extort its wealth.” Finally, let’s wrap up this piece with the warning that President Eisenhower issued in his 1961 Farewell Address regarding America’s new, Cold War-era, overgrown military establishment: This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. . . .Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. . . . In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted.
  • Miscellaneous Items of Interest

    Miscellaneous Items of Interest

    Click the LP image to hear the song and watch the music video Mark your calendars!  November 23 is "Simas Kudirka Day."   Eight years later (in 1978), CBS aired a made-for-television movie special about the Kudirka incident.  It starred Alan Arkin of M*A*S*H fame. I've seen the film and highly recommend that you do, too. &nbsp; For some strange reason, though, this movie has never been officially released on DVD.  The following DVD cover image is taken from an unofficial release of the film that I found here at Modcinema.  As of November, 2014, it looks like there is also a custom-burned DVD-R version of the movie is being sold on Amazon here.     You can also search Google to try and find a copy of the movie. And here's a copy of the film that I found posted to YouTube in late 2018 -- unfortunately, whoever created this version of the video did a bad job and part of the picture is missing.  But it's the only copy available online right now, and as such might be worth viewing if you don't have the money to buy a DVD copy: Video running time: 2 hrs 15 mins Also in 1978, Kudirka put out a book about his experiences.  It's also out of print, but it looks like there are a few copies available used at the time I write this.  If you care about freedom and liberty, this might be a nice addition to your library. Kudirka's ordeal reminds me of the Elian Gonlazes situation back in 2000.    After a scene like this, I'm not surprised Elian grew up to decide that communist Cuba wasn't quite so bad.  Nice helmet, dude!   You might want to ask yourself why America today allows a virtual tidal wave of illegal economic immigrants from Mexico to pour into the country, with no end in sight, yet isolated political refugees from communist countries who risk their lives attempting to get to the USA and freedom are quickly captured and dutifully shipped back to their countries of origin.           That sure is one heck of a coincidence!  Yes, indeed.     Excerpt from Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823), a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court:   Evian is "naive" spelled backwards. Video running time: 15 seconds
  • The Bills in Your Wallet are not Lawful Money

    The Bills in Your Wallet are not Lawful Money

    Does the Paper Currency in Your Wallet Say This?Image is shrunk to fit your screen.   Right-click and View or Save to see it full-size. These are NOT Gold or Silver Certificates.  They are ordinary Federal Reserve Notes.  Most of the images of full bills (not close-ups) that you see on this page are shrunk to fit your screen.   If you want to see them in full-detail, right-click on the image and choose View or Save , so you will be better able to read what they actually say. If this note is "redeemable" in lawful money, then clearly the note itself is NOT lawful money.  If the note indicates that the bank will "pay to the bearer on demand" five dollars, then clearly the note itself is NOT five dollars. Both the old United States Notes (issued directly by the government) and the privately-issued Federal Reserve Notes originally contained guarantees of repayment in lawful money. This is as it should be, because the U.S. Constitution plainly holds: Article 1, Section. 10 No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.   “Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars.” Russell L. Munk, Assistant General Counsel, Department of the Treasury, February 18, 1977. “The term 'dollars' likewise is incorrect, which, according to constitutional definition, are monetary units, used in exchange, backed by gold and silver. Our present day fiat issues are supported by more printed paper of the same; therefore, they are correctly termed Federal Reserve Notes (FRN), not dollars." Robert P. Vichas, Handbook of Financial Mathematics, Formulas, and Tables (1979), p. 420. The American Dream - 30 Minute Cartoon (Must See!) "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." Thomas Jefferson Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars and they are not lawful money.  They are "bills" that the bank has to pay. What they owe us is Lawful Money -- not foreclosure notices. "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson." President Franlin D. RooseveltNovember 21st, 1933 US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Field wrote as part of his dissenting opinion in this case: From the decision of the court I see only evil likely to follow. There have been times within the memory of all of us when the legal-tender notes of the United States were not exchangeable for more than one-half of their nominal value. The possibility of such depreciation will always attend paper money. This inborn infirmity no mere legislative declaration can cure. If congress has the power to make the notes a legal tender and to pass as money or its equivalent, why should not a sufficient amount be issued to pay the bonds of the United States as they nature? Why pay interest on the millions of dollars of bonds now due when congress can in one day make the money to pay the principal? And why should there be any restraint upon unlimited appropriations by the government for all imaginary schemes of public improvement, if the printing-press can furnish the money that is needed for them? Possessing a "dollar bill" allows you to bill the bank for a lawful dollar. But they aren't paying -- and they haven't paid since 1934.  This is theft which is a crime.  This particular crime rises to the level of high treason, because our country has literally been stolen from right under our feet.    Those in power who have knowingly supported this ongoing fraud should be held accountable. This exhibit was based in large part on the research of Irwin Schiff, who has been incarcerated in a federal penitentiary in order to shut him up.  Update: On October 16, 2015, Irwin Schiff passed away from cancer, while shackled to his bed, in the infirmary of the prison where he had been incarcerated for almost ten years. He was 87 years old. For more information, see this eulogy written by his son Peter Schiff. High-level thievery by the megabanks is presently a major issue in Europe as well:    
  • Mandatory Injections

    Mandatory Injections

    "We are going to inject you, whether you like it or not."     Click image for full article Click image for full article. Click image for full article. "Don't worry ... you won't remember a thing!"   Click image for full article. Click image for full article. Click image for full article.     ... and in Georgia:
  • The European Union's War on Democracy

    The European Union's War on Democracy

    Democracy in Europe?  Stop Dreaming. May 2005: The people said NO to the E.U. June 2005: The people said NO to the E.U. June 2008: The people said NO to the E.U. June 2008: The E.U. dictatorship steamrolls ahead, as if the people had never said a damned thing. February 2006: October 2008: E.U. politicians officially adopt the flag and anthem which were part of the 2005 Constitution, despite the fact that European citizens have voted it down no less than three separate times. "To demonstrate your patriotism and submission to the new E.U. Superstate, please rise and place your right hand over your heart -- in solemn observance -- as you view the flag and listen to the E.U. National Anthem in the player below.  If you know the words, you can sing along in a quiet and respectful manner.  Don't try and cheat.  Agents may be watching through the cameras built into your computer & mobile phone to make sure you do it properly."   Video running time: one minute October 2008: E.U. officials announce that they will force Ireland to continue to hold referendums, until the people vote correctly.  October 2008, continued: The vast majority of British citizens assert that they, too, should have been given a vote on whether to yield control of their destinies to an E.U. super-state. December 2008 The new election for Ireland is now being scheduled. For complete article, click here.   January 2009   Scotland's top police call for an end to jury trials, a fundamental institution for the protection of individual rights which has existed in all civilized countries for hundreds of years. Mar 2009   Cze   Sep 2011   Oct 2011   Nov 2011       Dec 2011 Calls for "federal" Europ Mar 2012   May 2012   July 2012   Sep 2012   "Banks demanding a six day work week? That reminds me of the sign over the Nazi concentration camp at Auschwitz:"Arbeit Macht Frei (Work will set you free)." Oct 2012   November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 April 2013 May 2013 April 2019



Health Scams

  • The

    The "AIDS" Hoax

    Remember the whole "AIDS epidemic" which started in the early 1980s?  It's funny how we don't hear a whole lot about that anymore, isn't it?   There is a reason why.  Here are just a few of the very best resources that I'd recommend on the subject. For decades, the medical-pharmaceutical complex has been engaging in deception and mass murder.   Spend some time watching the documentaries and reviewing the materials shown below ... ... and then you'll know why Magic is smiling.   Magic Johnson is still alive! The two documentary videos that begin this page are required viewing for everyone: The Other Side of AIDS  HIV = AIDS: Fact or Fraud? If video won't play, click here. You can also buy the full film on DVD here. PCR Test Inventor Kary Mullis Says Dr. Fauci is a Quack Video running time: 2 minutes For background information about this video, see: The above video was shot sometime during the late 80s or early 90s in the context of a conversation regarding the false HIV=AIDS misinformation (watch the above documentaries to learn more about that). Fast forward over thirty years to 2021 ... some things never change: Voting will not remove them, even if your vote was counted honestly. The African genocide continues ... I'm not surprised that a disease is found to be "cured" if it never existed in the first place! In July of 2013, the AIDS hoax is still going strong. Something strange sure is going on ... Additional Recommended Resources Articles The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot by Alan Cantwell, M.D. Informative Websites "Information that raises questions about the accuracy of HIV tests, the safety and effectiveness of AIDS drug treatments, and the validity of most common assumptions about HIV and AIDS." To help you make better informed health decisions, this Web site archives evidence and opinions of scientists, journalists and others against the myths of AIDS. The site contains more than 1500 pages with over 1000 articles. Most of these articles have been published in (peer-reviewed) journals, magazines, and newspapers. Peter Duesberg's HIV/AIDS research web site. Peter H. Duesberg, Ph.D. is a professor of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California, Berkeley. AIDS Controversy A growing group of scientists challenge the idea that HIV is harmful or causes "AIDS."
  • Cancer


    Kill Cancer by Starving It If you can prevent free radical damage to the mitochondria, you can prevent cancer. Treating cancer requires taking away the tumor cells’ energy sources of glucose and glutamine. The ketogenic diet and intermittent fasting are excellent tools for taking away the glucose. Tumor cells can’t use ketones for fuel. Keto is then paired with the drug DON, a powerful glutamine inhibitor.  Dr. Berg Interviews Professor Thomas Seyfried about the cancer starvation approach A World Without Cancer (G. Edward Griffin) The Science and Politics of Cancer (G. Edward Griffin)


Weaponized Psychiatry

 Clippings on Psychological Warfare and Psychiatric Abuse

Note:   Additional important materials on this subject, beyond just my original research materials, are included in the Weaponized Psychiatry section of this website.  The entire section is accessible via the main menu at the top of every page of this website.




 Additional original research exhibits by Jeff are found in the Freedom, Correspondence, and Blog sections of this website (also accessible via the main menu at the top of every page).

Pin It