Scripted News Footage
In this clip from The Conan O'Brien Show, we see how literally dozens of television news presenters read from the exact same script when reporting on a story about gay marriage laws.
Video running time: 3 minutes
Conan also provided another example of many different "reporters" reading from the EXACT SAME script, this time about rising gas prices. As you watch these videos, ask yourself: is this supposed to be funny? If so, to whom?
Video running time: 1 min 22 seconds
What is really going on here is that our controllers, the guys behind-the-scenes who run the intelligence agencies of "our" government, are literally throwing their covert control of the "mainstream media" in our faces. They are putting it right out there on a major talk show, as plain as day, making it crystal clear that all of these so-called "journalists" that they show us on TV are all just a bunch of paid parrots, doing what they're told, getting paid to read from scripts that someone else has given them. And of course the general public doesn't catch on, continuing to chew their cud (e.g., TV, Netflix, other mainstream "news" services), so maybe they really are no better than the cattle which our leaders view them as.
As P.T. Barnum stated, "there's a sucker born every minute."
IMPORTANT: SEE ALSO Mind Control 201 - Brain Implant Bloopers
(live news feeds in which television reporters experience apparent neurological malfunctions)
British Newspapers Challenge New Press Rules
By STEPHEN CASTLE and ALAN COWELL
Published March 19, 2013
LONDON — A day after British lawmakers agreed to ground rules for a new press code, an array of newspapers protested on Tuesday against the attempt to impose stricter curbs on this country’s scoop-driven dailies following the phone hacking scandal that convulsed Rupert Murdoch’s media empire and much of British public life.
In a statement, the newspaper society representing 1,100 newspapers said provisions for fines of up to $1.5 million on errant newspapers would impose a “crippling burden” on cash-strapped publications struggling against the inroads of the Internet.
“A free press cannot be free if it is dependent on and accountable to a regulatory body recognized by the state," the president of the society, Adrian Jeakings, said.
Indeed, the conservative Daily Mail commented in an editorial, “The bitter irony is this long-drawn out debate comes when the Internet — which, being global, has no regulatory restraints — is driving newspapers out of business.”
“If politicians had devoted half as much of their energies to keeping a dying industry alive, instead of hammering another nail into its coffin, democracy would be in a healthier state today.”
Newspaper proprietors and editors have not so far signed on to the agreement announced on Monday and say they were excluded from late-night cross-party talks on the new code while privacy campaigners clamoring for tighter press controls took part in the deliberations. Some indicated on Tuesday that they would not be rushed into responding to the proposed restrictions.
“We need to go back a long way — to 1695, and the abolition of the newspaper licensing laws — to find a time when the press has been subject to statutory regulation. Last night, Parliament decided that 318 years was long enough to let newspapers and magazines remain beyond its influence, and agreed a set of measures that will involve the state, albeit tangentially, in their governance,” the conservative Daily Telegraph said.
Lawmakers on Monday “urged the newspaper industry to endorse the new dispensation as quickly as possible,” the newspaper said. “However, after 318 years of a free press, its detail deserves careful consideration.”
The agreement announced Monday creates a system under which erring newspapers will face big fines and come up against a tougher press regulator with new powers to investigate abuses and order prominent corrections in publications that breach standards.
The deal, struck in the early hours of Monday, enshrines the powers of the regulator in a royal charter — the same document that sets out the rules and responsibilities of the British Broadcasting Corporation and the Bank of England.
That ended a fierce dispute, which divided the coalition government, over whether new powers should instead be written into law.
The idea of legislation raised alarms among those cherishing three centuries of broad peacetime freedom for Britain’s newspapers. They included Prime Minister David Cameron, who said a law establishing a press watchdog would cross a Rubicon — Caesar’s point of no return — toward government control because it could be amended to be even stricter by future governments that might want to curb the press.
"The Lynching" (Clip from Afterburner with Bill Whittle)
Video running time: Ten minutes