This exhibit is designed to point out the critically important distinction between cellular neurotechnology and directed energy weapons.
In this exhibit, building on the work of silenced victim/activist Jeremy, I will focus on the all-too-common "straw man" disinformation dealing with the irrelevant topic of "directed energy weapons." Material on this subject is being widely disseminated via internet sites dedicated to targeted individual issues, so as to divert victims' attention from resources dealing with the classified MKULTRA neurotechnology actually in use.
In these campaigns, operatives masquerading as victims publish websites and participate on internet discussion forums. In more than one instance, they have solicited monetary donations from actual victims for the claimed purpose of purchasing expensive equipment to figure out what "frequencies" are being "beamed" at them. The primary purpose is not to collect money as such (although depriving targeted individuals of financial resources is certainly a related goal) but rather in this instance to frame the very issue of targeting itself in terms of "directed energy weapons" abuses -- which is a smokescreen.
Directed-energy weapons are a fact of modern military and law-enforcement technology and without a doubt are subject to abuse by authorities. However, spending money on frequency counting equipment is probably not going to help you if what you are actually dealing with is advanced cellular technology in your brain. The solution to brain implants would be removal or disabling of the device. Trying to "block the frequency" as such would probably be an exercise in futility.
For example, modern GSM cellular networks use advanced frequency-hopping algorithms where the frequency of the transmission changes several hundred times per second according to a pre-determined mathematical formula. Whatever type of wireless network is being used to control the brain implants is probably also using some type of extremely advanced frequency hopping and/or spread-spectrum technologies. I suspect that the guys who engineered these systems probably get a big laugh over all the victims on the internet trying to figure out what "frequency" they are being "attacked" by.
The following clippings from the web serve as inline footnotes to the above discussion. I continue with additional comments below.
|[From:] John Allman
I agree. But I wouldn't recommend equipment that detected carrier waves, but not modulation content, to anybody.
Consider somebody who has experiences that suggest that he (or she) is being manipulated, either directly or via a prosthesis. How can he tell which?
[Response from Jeff]
If you mean remote mind control via implant versus without implant, then I am not actually sure. My best answer would be to say that I agree with Jeremy's appraisal of the situation at the Bioethics hearings, which I have pasted below for your review.
I'm not familiar with any devices that can detect/decode "modulation content" of a transmission that is digitally encrypted and/or using frequency hopping spread spectrum types of technologies.
You can go to Radio Shack and buy a Bearcat scanner that can pick up the narrow FM carrier frequencies used by a lot of police, fire, ham radio etc. Those are unencrypted analog signals. Some of the newer equipment might also be able to decode some digitally modulated signals, I'm not really sure.
But take your modern cell phone on a GSM network, which is one thing I know a bit about. The "modulation content" as you describe it (your spoken voice) is going to be digitally compressed (like an MP3 music file) then encrypted for privacy, all in the phone in real-time, then that encrypted digital signal goes out through the antenna over the airwaves, changing frequency over 200 times per second. That technology was put into commercial use in the 1990s. As advanced as it sounds, IT'S OLD NEWS.
So I guess my point would be that advanced classified mind control technology, the effects of which make clear that it is a two-way communication channel directly to your brain and mind itself, is probably going to be using something more advanced that the cell phone technology that has been public knowledge for 20 years or so. So there won't be any commercially available equipment available to you or me that would help us in any way.
That's my two cents. Maybe I am wrong.
From: John Allman
Thank you for your prompt reply.
How did [Jeremy from AreYouTargeted.com] reach his conclusion that implants that had been rendered undetectable by miniaturisation and/or camouflage, provided "the most likely explanation"? Why do you "agree" with that guess of his?
[Response from Jeff]
I don't know how Jeremy reached his conclusions, but I can tell you how I reached mine.
I agree with his guess because the capabilities demonstrated by the technology include extremely fine-tuned control of the human mind itself. Therefore, based on my understanding of technology, it seems clear to me that this would be done far more easily with implanted technology than without. It's the simpler solution and therefore the more likely.
There are frequently articles in the news nowadays about new machines being built at the nano- or atomic level. Extremely small technology is a fact of modern science. I have documented some examples here.
So implants not showing up on conventional scanning equipment doesn't surprise me at all, especially if concealment was one of the design parameters to begin with.
It's a guess, but I think a reasonable and informed one.
Response from Jeff:
Sounds like "they" (some type of black ops) got you, alright.
Don't rely on keyed locks alone to keep your home secure. The people who are doing this stuff have master keys that they can use to enter your home even if your doors are locked.
They also have the capability to remotely render you unconscious before they even come near your home, so you want to use physical barriers to prevent your home from being entered. Position them in such a way that it would be impossible to enter and exit your home without disturbing them. That way, when you wake up in the morning you will have a concrete way to determine if your home may have been entered while you were asleep.
The tones in your ears are a widely reported symptom of mind control, especially by those in the programs masquerading as "alien" abduction. They probably put implants in your ears.
It seems clear that you, like many others today, are a subject of a classified modern mind control program. Spend some time looking at the research material on this website; hopefully some of it will be useful to you.
A few weeks ago (I am writing this paragraph on Dec 12, 2012), I started getting e-mail blasts from "Federation Resistance Global Electronic Harassment Opposition Party." This claims to be a group whose members include some high-profile targeted individuals, several of whom the work of which I have posted on my website in the past. However, based on subesquent e-mails it appears to be at least primarily the work of a single individual, namely one Greg Gamache.
This effort appears extremely questionable to me and I am seeing a LOT of red flags. They are sending out e-mails encouraging people to sign up for a lawsuit which they allege will result in FBI and FCC action to get their "EH" (electronic harassment) "turned off."
I don't think the FBI or FCC are in any position to do anything about this. I think that this is something that is occurring at a level of power above that of the visible agencies of our government, and I don't think that "electronic harassment" is an accurate choice of terminology to begin with.
Nonsense if you ask me. Frequency counters will not "detect frequencies going to you" unless it is A) a single frequency, and B) so strong that it is more powerful than any other at the same spot. If someone is within a short distance of you pointing some kind of powerful microwave or radio transmitter directly at you, then maybe this would stand a chance.
But if I am correct and what most targeted individuals are dealing with on a daily basis is not directed energy but cellular neurotechnology in their brains, then a frequency counter is not going to detect the source of your problem. There may not even be any transmission active at the time of the measurement, and even if there was it would be lost among all the other radio transmissions passing through the same location, like local communications systems, TV, broadcast radio, cell phones, etc.
As a point of comparison, your cell phone sits idle monitoring a control channel the vast majority of the time. It's listening but that control channel transmission from the cell tower is certainly not going to show up on your frequency counter. Neither is the TV station miles away which your TV can nevertheless pick up.
Anyone who follows the above advice and videotapes themselves trying to "detect frequencies going to them" will just end up making an ass of themselves on YouTube and making targeted individuals as a group look like fools.
Hmm, maybe that's the whole point. On June 30, 2013 Mr. Gamache sent out another e-mail seemingly designed to bait recipients into taking self-harming actions. The following bizarre message was carbon copied to no less than 246 people:
I can't imagine that anyone would be foolish enough to do as he suggests, but perhaps there are a few desperate people out there who don't understand what is going on here and might get drawn into something like this. Well, that will wrap up one particularly egregious example of the nonsense now flooding the internet on this subject.
Here is a brief exchange with a reader of my website who is somehow involved in activism relating to this subject:
From: James Lico <[email protected]>;
I see that you want to stick to the topic of mind control. This is the problem we are having when we try to explain the the reason to authorities. No one believes us because it sounds so incredible. But now we have a new paradigm which is now believable. This is the reason why I have to inform the members of my group, because this is so controversial.
How can you tell that we are not being used as human DE lab animals?
[remainder of e-mail put forth sender's argument for DEW abuse]
Response from Jeff
You ask me how can I "tell that we are not being used as human DE lab animals?"
There are a million possible abuses that we COULD be subjected to. Just because something COULD happen does not necessarily mean that it IS happening in a particular case or to a particular group.
If I am reading your first two paragraphs correctly, you are saying that when you complain to the authorities about mind control, no one believes you because it sounds so incredible. But now, in the topic of directed energy weapons, you have found an explanation which sounds less incredible and therefore constitutes a "new paradigm which is now believable." In other words, you want to focus on something because it SOUNDS good, regardless of whether or not it is ACTUALLY relevant to your situation.
It puzzles me that your reason for wanting to "sounding believable" is because you want to "try to explain the reason to authorities." Whether it's mind control or DEWs involved, in EITHER case it is obviously being done by state actors. So your whole idea about "sounding beleivable to authorities" seems pointless in either case. That's like a Jew in 1930s Germany trying to report the existence of concentration camps to Nazi troops, and they don't believe him. Wow, what a surprise!
THE AUTHORITIES ARE THE ONES PERPETRATING THE ABUSE. THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T LISTEN TO YOUR COMPLAINTS.
I am trying to make a very simple point. MKULTRA mind control abuses using advanced neurotechnology are widespread and out of control. They are deliberately trying to confuse victims by diverting victims' attention to what I believe is the irrelevant subject of directed energy weapons. THAT is the fundamental issue facing targeted individuals.
I do not believe that abuse of D.E.W.s is widespread. EVEN IF IT WAS, however, that would not change the fact that the discussion of D.E.W.s is purposefully used as a cover for the far greater threat to human freedom posed by the deployment of classified neurotechnology against non-consenting (and mostly unaware) civilians.
I will conclude this research exhibit with an e-mail exchange that I feel nicely summarizes the point I am trying to make:
Response from Jeff
While it might be technically true to say that all radio communication is in fact a form of "directed energy," in this context it becomes a very misleading use of the phrase, which already has a well-established and particular association with weapons applications.
The perpetrators of these war crimes are waging deliberate disinformation campaigns to confuse and mislead MKULTRA subjects (targeted individuals), and promoting false theories about the abuse of "directed energy weapons" is currently one of the primary operations.
An excerpt from an e-mail I wrote to another TI activist, who had pointed out to me that voices, images and other effects could be inputted into the human brain directly by means of microwaves or electromagnetic radiation, without the use of neurotechnology:
I have some background in technology. It is my opinion that most of the talk about satellites in the context of targeted individuals is disinformation. There is simply no need to use satellites for this purpose. Terrestrial wireless data networks seem a far more likely answer. There is a reason why iPhones and Androids use cellular networks rather than satellites. Today's high speed data networks provide far more bandwidth per user than a satellite connection. The same logic should apply to implanted devices.
Also, controlling thoughts or images in the brain requires that the signal arrive intact. If it was beamed from a satellite or from someone some distance away using some kind of microwave device, the signal would be subject to interference, like static on the radio or TV, which would degrade the content. If the "beam" was not constantly focused on the target, it would "miss" or possibly affect unintended third parties. The countless reports I have studied do not support this explanation. I believe it is disinformation.
However, a wireless data connection with implanted neurotechnology could transmit the content to the implant digitally (correcting for errors). The implant then in turn modulates the content into the appropriate electrical activity in the brain. In other words, the neurotechnology acts as a "modem" or a "cell phone" in your brain.
I am convinced that this is the correct explanation. [...] I have no doubt that it may be possible to control the human brain using the means you discuss, particularly under laboratory conditions, but it seems to me that logistically it's just not possible to make it work in the field on a mass scale.
The following e-mail was received at my non-public e-mail address on November 24, 2014. More of the same. Note that the author uses an e-mail address ending with the number "33" (masonic identifier). In other words, this is clearly another abuser masquerading as a victim.
Derrick Robinson, the leader of FFCHS ("Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance"), an organization allegedly dedicated to helping victims, actively promotes what I contend is extremely harmful disinformation (see MC301) in order to confuse modern MKULTRA subjects about this topic:
And here's an excerpt from one of Derrick's newsletters, in which he again promotes this "frequency" nonsense:
So I suggest you don't start acting like a nutcase and dressing up like Chuck from the new TV show "Better Call Saul," even though many websites are out there trying to make you believe this will somehow solve your problems. Otherwise you're likely to find yourself locked up in a mental hospital being laughed at by MKULTRA doctors and psychiatrists.