In 1988, an inmate in a Utah prison named James Fratus wrote a letter describing how he was being tortured through the use of some kind of synthetic telepathy technology that allowed his jailers to play back his thoughts over a loudspeaker in real-time. (Research It)
If you haven't already seen both of the Bioethics Hearings videos (on the home page of this site), and heard Jeremy's podcasts, I would highly recommend you take the time to do so now. His ideas might shed some light on the "hows" of getting large numbers of people to appear to be harassing someone.
There is a very real possibility the abuse of this technology may soon be affecting someone you know or care about, and having as accurate an understanding as possible about what is going on may make all the difference in the world. It might mean the difference between life and death, or between freedom and institutionalization.
Are you familiar with what a modern "smartphone" can do? What if you remove the screen, buttons and other user interface elements, and just leave the CPU, radio and power source, then miniaturize that?
Then implant the device in somebody's brain while you have them unconscious? And it has a high-speed connection over a cellular (or other wireless data) network?
Then you leave it there for years and never use it in any way that would cause the implantee to become aware that it was even there.
What if you did this to large numbers of people?
The film Cyborg 2087 was released in 1966, and featured a scene where a character "from the future" described how in the twenty-first century, all human beings would have their brains implanted from birth, and their thoughts controlled by the state through a technology called radio-telepathy.
In real-world application, the technology today is more commonly referred to as "synthetic telepathy" rather than "radio-telepathy."
This film contains a couple of revelations that apparently were intended to be overlooked by the general public at the time of its release, but which today have become glaringly obvious thanks to internet access making research of these obscure subjects much easier.
In the story, the discovery of radio-telepathy is credited to "Dr. Marx," an obvious reference to the alleged founder of communism. Additionally, the female doctor in the film is named "Dr. Mason," who is tasked with keeping the secret "from falling into the wrong hands." This refers to the global occult ("masonic" in the generic sense) network whose members perpetrate capital crimes against the civilian populations of their own countries using these technologies, and who on pain of death conceal its existence.
Further elucidation on this point is contained in my equally-important research exhibit entitled Freemasonry 101: Mind Control which should be reviewed together with this page. Additional reference material on the true origins of the Communist ideology falsely attributed to Karl Marx is here.
The freeze-frame below shows a scene from the film indicating that the radio-telepathy demonstration takes place at a company named "THE MONARCH CORP." This is also a hidden "easter egg" revelation: butterflies in general -- and the term "monarch" in particular -- are signature symbols used by real-world mind control operations.
The specific division of the Monarch corporation depicted here is named "Future Industries." This is an allusion to the fact that technologies are first developed in secret by the military-industrial complex, and only made public after much time (often decades) have passed.
Researcher Fritz Springmeier wrote extensively on this subject. The following is an excerpt from his work:
A great deal of Monarch programming and slave abuse, (as well as the drug trade) is done under three major covers or fronts: Religious Fronts, the Front of National Security and the Military, and the Entertainment fields, especially the Country Western Industry, the Rock Music Industry and Hollywood. The religious fronts were popular for centuries, especially when groups like the Jesuits, the Assassins, and other groups held immense power. Religious fronts are still being used such as J.Z. Knight, Elizabeth Claire Prophet's CUT church, the Church of Scientology, the Charismatic movement, Jim Jones and Jonestown, and David Koresh's group etc. Billy Ray Moore's Lord's Chapel is entirely a mind-control operation. There is a nondenomination Pentecostal church in southern Washington whose entire membership is Satanists under mind-control. It would take a book to explain how these religious fronts are part of the total trauma-based mind-control and how they operate to protect mind-control, however there are publications which go into some of the CIA connections to these groups. It is suggested that interested persons read these publications.
Thought BroadcastingA symptom of schizophrenia in which a patient reports hearing the thoughts of others, being able to broadcast his/her own thoughts, and hear thoughts or voices where none exist. Specific manifestations may include a paranoid belief that thoughts are being recorded and re-broadcast by a radio or by a voice outside one’s heads. When thought broadcasting occurs regularly, it begins to affect behaviour and interferes with the person's ability to function in societySegen's Medical Dictionary. © 2012 Farlex, Inc.
Here is a clip from the 2003 film Control Factor, a fictional movie based on actual scientific developments that are not generally known about. It contains the common disinformation theme of confounding synthetic telepathy neurotechnology with voice-to-skull audio transmission (a point discussed at length in my companion article MC402 - Brain Implants vs. DEWs) but is otherwise quite on-point and relevant in its presentation:
This technology is now being used to mind control unsuspecting citizens who have been abducted, had their brains implanted, amnesia then induced (most likely by drugging and/or neurotechnological means), and returned to their beds or other places of abduction with no memory or obvious signs of what happened to them.
This is what all the "alien abduction" stories in the media during the past several decades were all about; a cover story for government abductions and mind-control. Researcher Martin Cannon figured this out in the 1990s and wrote one of the most important research papers ever written on the subject, entitled "The Controllers." This essay put forth his theory that "alien abduction" was a cover story for U.S. government mind control programs. Not too long afterwards, he had a rather sudden "change of heart":
Today, we hear less about "aliens" because the technology has gone mainstream, and modern victims are instead lead to believe that they are being "stalked by gangs" or are mentally ill. In reality, however, it is just the continuation of the atrocities which began no later than the 1950s with MKULTRA.
Victims who complain to medical personnel will immediately have their charts noted as having made statements that fit the "diagnostic criteria" for mental illness -- as defined by popular vote (not scientific facts) of participating committee members and then codified into the "DSM" -- the Diagnostic & Statistical Manual used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental disorders.
Once classified as "mentally ill," a person can be deprived of their liberty without regard to the due process protections contained in the Bill of Rights (or similar provisions in many countries outside of the U.S.). The whole system was set up this way on purpose, to accomplish the long-term goal of creating a social order where the population can be directly controlled in a manner most people never would have dreamed possible. This goal is now being realized and will radically change the relationship between governments and individual human beings forever if something is not done to stop it.
How this all turns out depends at least partly on how *you* respond to this information today and in the future.
This article is continued in the Mind Control 102, 103, etc. exhibits which are available via the Special Exhibits section of this website (or by clicking the links at the top right).
The neurotechnology that the secret agencies have been implanting in people's brains not only allows them to modulate/demodulate the neurological patterns associated with human thought ("synthetic telepathy") but by extension also allows them to cause implanted subjects to speak involuntarily out loud.
In other words, not only are your private thoughts not necessarily your own, but also when you speak it is possible that the impulse to speak and the choice of words was likewise caused remotely by a government handler/operator. In either case, you will not become consciously aware that the technology is active when you think "their" thoughts or speak "their" words. The technology BYPASSES YOUR CONSCIOUS WILL AND PERCEPTION. You will think the thought, or speak the word, but in most cases you will not be able to discern that it was not of your own will, except in cases where the handler causes an alarm designed to get your attention, such as causing other physiological responses in your body, or sounds in the environment to which you have been conditioned, occurring simultaneously with the artificially-induced thought or speech.
What this means is that if you are a subject of these capital and outrageous human rights violations, then your operator/handler has the capability to communicate with you by making you speak THEIR words out loud using YOUR voice, all via remote control of your brain itself.
Any complaints you make about this sort of treatment to law enforcement or medical personnel will result in an immediate and automatic diagnosis of schizophrenia which will then make it possible for them to arrest, institutionalize, confine, drug, or further experiment on you against your will.
The news clippings which follow represent information that is designed for public consumption. The actual level of technology being covertly deployed against civilian populations is many decades more advanced. See the other exhibits in this series for a fuller understanding of this critically important topic.
The non-public government perfected the synthetic telepathy technology a long time ago. They can not only read your mind and subconscious thoughts, but the technology allows them to artificially inject thoughts and motor commands into your mind, and it is so seamless that you will never know that it was happening. You will think the thoughts are your own. They can also record your thoughts (including any modifications they have introduced without your consent) and use it in ways that are to your detriment, if you are a "targeted individual."
They can also induce artificial dreams including both the visual and auditory components -- in other words, what may in fact be nothing more than digital video transmitted wirelessly to implants in your brain that in turn modulate the signal into the appropriate neurological patterns so that your subconscious mind plays it out as a "dream."
THIS IS REALLY HAPPENING, CLANDESTINELY AND WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE SUBJECTS.
It is all vicious, criminal, psychopathic practice of human ownership. In many respects it is far worse than forms of human slavery practiced in the past, because at least those slaves enjoyed the integrity of their own minds.
This last clipping from the NIH is a big joke. "A major step toward cord-free control," indeed. At a time when every other person seems to have an iPhone glued to their ear, do they really expect people to believe this drivel? I am here to tell you that a significant portion of the civilian population ALREADY has classified mind control neurotechnology in their brains. The deployment of the technology has been underway for decades, probably in iterative phases as the real (classified) technology developed. The people responsible need to be aggressively prosecuted as war criminals.
Video clip from University of Washington
Running time: 1 min 30 seconds
There have been numerous news items over the last few years about major television news reporters suddenly beginning to speak in complete gibberish during live television presentations. The writers of these stories always think that something very strange and mysterious is going on, and speculate as to what that might be. Did the reporter have a stroke on air? Were they being hit by secret microwaves?
There is a simple black-and-white answer. As I have documented elsewhere in this series, state security services have been covertly implanting citizens with classified "synthetic telepathy" neurotechnology. My research indicates that the technology was perfected no later than the mid 1960s, and possibly by the 1940s.
A significant portion of the civilian population ALREADY has government implants in their brains which allows remote control of the mind (verbal thoughts, perceived images and sounds, nightly dreams, motor commands). I don't know the exact numbers, but I have reason to believe that young children in average families have been implanted, so it logically follows that people in positions of public influence like these news reporters would almost certainly be "owned" in this very physical way. The only thing I'm not really sure about is whether these incidents were caused by malfunctions in the neurotechnology, or were deliberately instigated by the remote operators.
I used to have individual videos published of each instance of the reporters having on-air meltdowns, but all of these events have now been included in a compilation video, so I am posting that here instead. The most interesting thing about this compilation is that whoever edited it together added some text to the very beginning of the video: "This could be the early steps of humanity evolving into something else in 2012." Spiritual evolution and 2012 mythology are both extremely common disinformation themes, as I have previously documented (see MC301).
This tells me that the compilation video was probably put together in at attempt at damage control. Since the story involved television broadcasts that had already been viewed and possibly recorded by millions of people, it could not be simply erased from history. So a version of the story was deliberately put out with the disinformation text added at the very beginning to throw viewers off track.
Interestingly, the video concludes with an example of this happening to radio co-host Ian Punnett of Coast to Coast AM. Coast is a widely-syndicated late night talk radio program in the United States which heavily promotes disinformation topics. Host George Noory introduces the segment in question by saying "next hour, [...] we talk about one of Ian Punnet's favorite subjects, cryptozoology." I think it is quite telling that an journalist associated with this particular type of program subsequently became a victim of the technology himself.
Video running time: 5 minutes
Video: Michael Mosley has areas of his brain turned off
Running time: 1 minute
Deactivating speech centers of the brain
Video running time: 4 minutes
Also See: Pushing the Envelope in Controlled Media
The shooter in this Huffington Post news article certainly looks crazy. What I am wondering, however, is whether or not he was deliberately driven crazy by ACTUAL telepathic harassment of the kind that seems to be in widespread use today, and that relies on wireless brain implants which are put into people's heads during covert abduction events.
Targeted individuals are reporting this in alarming numbers lately, and this is shaping up to be one of the largest mass human rights violations of all times.
For more on the above story, see MKULTRA Subject Kazuki Hirano Requests Assistance.
Santiago now faces the death penalty, but the intelligence operatives who run the modern day neurotechnology-based mind control system, and who were ultimately responsible for Santiago's rampage, will undoutedly remain beyond the reach of the "law." The FBI and police don't get paid to investigate THEM. No, many of your "law enforcement" personnel have in fact sworn formal oaths to conceal their crimes. They will do so as they wish to continue receiving their paychecks. So instead, they'll just take mind control subjects in for "mental health" evaluations, a process that involves no trial and no jury. Because the psychiatric establishment is, after all, just an arm of system designed in large part to conceal the existence of classified mind-invasive technology. The domestic war criminals remain free, and the victims are conveniently locked up.
The families of the shooting victims will likely applaud the enforcement droids who in reality work for the people responsible for the deaths of, or injuries to, their kin. And the general public will continue not to care. They will keep watching football, and voting in their rigged elections, and tuning in to see the latest episode of the Walking Dead, and signing up to serve in the armies of whatever "national government" rules their particular chunk of land, and pretending everything is just fine.
I just came across the case of Anissa Weier, a twelve-year-old girl who was involved in the stabbing of another kid based on her delusion that a fictional character was going to hurt her if she didn't. As with so many other "mentally ill" attackers, Weier reported that she believed her mind was being read. As those who have studied this website will immediately realize, this is a red flag indicating that the actor is most likely a CIA mind control subject. Synthetic telepathy neurotechnology has existed for a long time and is a key tool used in manipulating mind control subjects. But it remains classified and they can get away with claiming people like Anissa Weier are simply "mentally ill." The following are a few snippets from "news media" coverage of the Weier case, with my markings in red:
It seems to me that Anissa Weier's problems have only just begun. She is an apparent mind control subject who is now being taken away from her family and locked up in a mental hospital -- where she will spend at least three years in the physical custody of the very MKULTRA psychiatrists who are responsible for both her mind control and her violent actions. Another life ruined.
9/19/2017 update - Another interesting aspect of the Weier case is that the perpetrators' motive was to offer their victim as a human sacrifice. For a background on why this is highly relevant to mind control, see the links below under "Related."
The intelligence agency (state-) controlled American mass media won't talk about this. Instead, they'll just have one of their PR puppets (euphemistically referred to as "reporters") talk about how one of their different PR puppets (euphemistically referred to as "politicians") wants to introduce stricter gun control legislation, which is an "obviously" needed response:
It seems like lately, if there is a mass shooting incident being publicized by the mainstream media, one can pretty safely assume that the shooter was a CIA mind control subject. In just about every case lately, there exists some major red flag that the "mental health" issues being suffered by these shooters is really a symptom of CIA mind control. In other words, the "psychiatric problems" are not at all organic or natural, but artificially caused by physical mind control technology being used against the subject (almost certainly in the form of classified brain implants, as discussed elsewhere in this series).
In the case of the Nashville Waffle House shooter Travis Reinking, in addition to his more bizarre behavior and claims, he was also an avowed "sovereign citizen" -- meaning someone who publicly rejects the authority of all existing governmental structures. In other words, he was a political dissident, making him an overwhelmingly obvious target for neutralization by the domestic intelligence services. He had also made statements that he was being subjected to harassment and surveillance, which is commonly reported by individuals who are in fact being targeted by the state. The problem is that, unlike the citizens of the former Soviet Union or East Germany, the public in the modern western World doesn't get that they are in fact living in an intelligence-agency-controlled dictatorship that controls the mass media, so the normal citizens just buy into whatever BS the "media" reports -- in this case, that these mass shooters have "mental health" issues and that gun control is the solution.
What is really happening here is that we are living in a dictatorship in which the very concept of political dissent cannot be permitted to exist; rather, anyone who disputes the authority of the state must be delusional, since the state's absolute authority is beyond question.
In Reinking's case, the media focuses on the horror of the atrocity itself, and the delusional symptoms of the shooter (in Reinking's case, his erratic behavior and delusional beliefs about Taylor Swift) but of course does not discuss the true underlying cause of the mental illness.
A modern version of MKULTRA is presently in widespread operation in many nations. It involves the covert implantation of classified neurotechnology into the brains and bodies of non-consenting and unaware subjects. This is accomplished by "black operations" involving home entries, complicit personnel in medical and custodial settings, and possibly other means. The civilian population as a whole, including children, is the target.
Concerted efforts are made to prevent subjects from understanding what is happening to them. Amnesia is artificially induced to prevent them from recalling anything about these events, most likely by means of electrical stimulation of the claustrum or other parts of the brain using previously-implanted neurotechnology and/or the application of drugs such as anesthetics, scopolamine or benzodiazepines.
The secrecy of these programs is preserved with the aid of disinformation campaigns or "cover stories." These campaigns include a number of carefully chosen themes.
All of my friends and relatives that I am in regular contact with are being handled by the DOD with sophisticated surveillance technology. This includes forms of communication such as letters, telephone, and person-to-person conversations.
Every conversation with friends and relatives is hijacked by the DOD’s C4ISR system, which instructs them to comment on my thoughts and the directed-energy weapons attacks that occurred moments earlier. Their statements frequently contain painful phrases.
Friends and family also participate in what appears to be computer-generated PsyActs every time I’m around them. Similar to the battleswarms, I’ve concluded that these acts are run by a computer program, which simultaneously instructs multiple relatives and friends to participate in a single display.
A majority of these acts are what most people would consider to be silly. They are typically insulting. Many appear to be intended to portray me as an incompetent fool.
(Mark Rich, http://www.newworldwar.org/myexperience.htm)
Excerpted from a book:
The alchemical principle of the Revelation of the Method has as its chief component, a clown-like, grinning mockery of the victim(s) as a show of power and macabre arrogance. When this is performed in a veiled manner accompanied by certain occult signs and symbolical words and elicits no meaningful response of opposition or resistance from the target(s), it is one of the most efficacious techniques of psychological warfare and mind-rape.
Michael Hoffman, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare
From an internet forum:
Briefly back to Communion if you don't mind - I have had this little niggly thought for a while now that there was something unnatural about that book, the way it was advertised and the effect it had on me, kind of like it was designed to trigger people. Which is also partly why Into The Fringe has had an impact on me. It did trigger a very real memory; But apart from that, as mentioned in the book, Communion was also involved in the start of Karla Turner's journey; I also bought Strieber's book on impulse, at the time not remembering what I'd forgotten.
In September 2013, radio host Alex Jones inteviewed Dr. John Hall, a medical doctor who claims to have spoken with thousands of modern mind control victims and purports to be an expert of the subject. During this 40 minute segment, Dr. Hall promoted a number of the disinformation topics identified in my above outline, particularly: "stalking," microwaves, directed energy weapons, and "satellite terrorism" (his term). At no time did he mention synthetic telepathy neurotechnology, which is the primary issue that all of the above disinformation topics are designed to conceal, despite the fact that its existence is now an acknowledged fact of modern science even in the unclassified literature.
This next one is notable because it comes from Derrick Robinson, the leader of FFCHS ("Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance"). For more information on why this is disinformation, see my article MC402: Brain Implants vs. Directed Energy Weapons.
Here is another example of what I call "screwball" complaints; i.e., those that appear designed to make MKULTRA victims, collectively, look like a bunch of incoherent nutcases:
I'll wrap up this rather serious research exhibit with a bit of on-topic levity.
Video running time: 4 minutes
People with the mind control neurotechnology in their brains can be made to act out ("evoked actions") in many ways, including involuntarily looking over at the clock and "noticing" specific patterns of numbers. These events are almost certainly pre-programmed and evoked by remote computer systems. The function of the brain implants is analagous to that of a consumer "smartphone," only much more advanced. Behavioral conditioning techniques can then be used to associate certain number patterns to specific meanings in the mind of the subject/target. A few examples:
1:19 Positive association (reverse of 9:11)
1:23 Positive association, moving forward
3:21 Negative association, moving backwards (reverse of 1:23)
4:11 Positive association, "information"
1:14 Negative association, concealment (reverse of 4:11)
11:11 (Widely-reported) Positive "spiritual" themed brainwashing
12:34 An alternative to 11:11 or 1:23
This exhibit is designed to point out the critically important distinction between cellular neurotechnology and directed energy weapons.
In this exhibit, building on the work of silenced victim/activist Jeremy, I will focus on the all-too-common "straw man" disinformation dealing with the irrelevant topic of "directed energy weapons." Material on this subject is being widely disseminated via internet sites dedicated to targeted individual issues, so as to divert victims' attention from resources dealing with the classified MKULTRA neurotechnology actually in use.
In these campaigns, operatives masquerading as victims publish websites and participate on internet discussion forums. In more than one instance, they have solicited monetary donations from actual victims for the claimed purpose of purchasing expensive equipment to figure out what "frequencies" are being "beamed" at them. The primary purpose is not to collect money as such (although depriving targeted individuals of financial resources is certainly a related goal) but rather in this instance to frame the very issue of targeting itself in terms of "directed energy weapons" abuses -- which is a smokescreen.
Directed-energy weapons are a fact of modern military and law-enforcement technology and without a doubt are subject to abuse by authorities. However, spending money on frequency counting equipment is probably not going to help you if what you are actually dealing with is advanced cellular technology in your brain. The solution to brain implants would be removal or disabling of the device. Trying to "block the frequency" as such would probably be an exercise in futility.
For example, modern GSM cellular networks use advanced frequency-hopping algorithms where the frequency of the transmission changes several hundred times per second according to a pre-determined mathematical formula. Whatever type of wireless network is being used to control the brain implants is probably also using some type of extremely advanced frequency hopping and/or spread-spectrum technologies. I suspect that the guys who engineered these systems probably get a big laugh over all the victims on the internet trying to figure out what "frequency" they are being "attacked" by.
The following clippings from the web serve as inline footnotes to the above discussion. I continue with additional comments below.
|[From:] John Allman
I agree. But I wouldn't recommend equipment that detected carrier waves, but not modulation content, to anybody.
Consider somebody who has experiences that suggest that he (or she) is being manipulated, either directly or via a prosthesis. How can he tell which?
[Response from Jeff]
If you mean remote mind control via implant versus without implant, then I am not actually sure. My best answer would be to say that I agree with Jeremy's appraisal of the situation at the Bioethics hearings, which I have pasted below for your review.
I'm not familiar with any devices that can detect/decode "modulation content" of a transmission that is digitally encrypted and/or using frequency hopping spread spectrum types of technologies.
You can go to Radio Shack and buy a Bearcat scanner that can pick up the narrow FM carrier frequencies used by a lot of police, fire, ham radio etc. Those are unencrypted analog signals. Some of the newer equipment might also be able to decode some digitally modulated signals, I'm not really sure.
But take your modern cell phone on a GSM network, which is one thing I know a bit about. The "modulation content" as you describe it (your spoken voice) is going to be digitally compressed (like an MP3 music file) then encrypted for privacy, all in the phone in real-time, then that encrypted digital signal goes out through the antenna over the airwaves, changing frequency over 200 times per second. That technology was put into commercial use in the 1990s. As advanced as it sounds, IT'S OLD NEWS.
So I guess my point would be that advanced classified mind control technology, the effects of which make clear that it is a two-way communication channel directly to your brain and mind itself, is probably going to be using something more advanced that the cell phone technology that has been public knowledge for 20 years or so. So there won't be any commercially available equipment available to you or me that would help us in any way.
That's my two cents. Maybe I am wrong.
From: John Allman
Thank you for your prompt reply.
How did [Jeremy from AreYouTargeted.com] reach his conclusion that implants that had been rendered undetectable by miniaturisation and/or camouflage, provided "the most likely explanation"? Why do you "agree" with that guess of his?
[Response from Jeff]
I don't know how Jeremy reached his conclusions, but I can tell you how I reached mine.
I agree with his guess because the capabilities demonstrated by the technology include extremely fine-tuned control of the human mind itself. Therefore, based on my understanding of technology, it seems clear to me that this would be done far more easily with implanted technology than without. It's the simpler solution and therefore the more likely.
There are frequently articles in the news nowadays about new machines being built at the nano- or atomic level. Extremely small technology is a fact of modern science. I have documented some examples here.
So implants not showing up on conventional scanning equipment doesn't surprise me at all, especially if concealment was one of the design parameters to begin with.
It's a guess, but I think a reasonable and informed one.
Response from Jeff:
Sounds like "they" (some type of black ops) got you, alright.
Don't rely on keyed locks alone to keep your home secure. The people who are doing this stuff have master keys that they can use to enter your home even if your doors are locked.
They also have the capability to remotely render you unconscious before they even come near your home, so you want to use physical barriers to prevent your home from being entered. Position them in such a way that it would be impossible to enter and exit your home without disturbing them. That way, when you wake up in the morning you will have a concrete way to determine if your home may have been entered while you were asleep.
The tones in your ears are a widely reported symptom of mind control, especially by those in the programs masquerading as "alien" abduction. They probably put implants in your ears.
It seems clear that you, like many others today, are a subject of a classified modern mind control program. Spend some time looking at the research material on this website; hopefully some of it will be useful to you.
A few weeks ago (I am writing this paragraph on Dec 12, 2012), I started getting e-mail blasts from "Federation Resistance Global Electronic Harassment Opposition Party." This claims to be a group whose members include some high-profile targeted individuals, several of whom the work of which I have posted on my website in the past. However, based on subesquent e-mails it appears to be at least primarily the work of a single individual, namely one Greg Gamache.
This effort appears extremely questionable to me and I am seeing a LOT of red flags. They are sending out e-mails encouraging people to sign up for a lawsuit which they allege will result in FBI and FCC action to get their "EH" (electronic harassment) "turned off."
I don't think the FBI or FCC are in any position to do anything about this. I think that this is something that is occurring at a level of power above that of the visible agencies of our government, and I don't think that "electronic harassment" is an accurate choice of terminology to begin with.
Nonsense if you ask me. Frequency counters will not "detect frequencies going to you" unless it is A) a single frequency, and B) so strong that it is more powerful than any other at the same spot. If someone is within a short distance of you pointing some kind of powerful microwave or radio transmitter directly at you, then maybe this would stand a chance.
But if I am correct and what most targeted individuals are dealing with on a daily basis is not directed energy but cellular neurotechnology in their brains, then a frequency counter is not going to detect the source of your problem. There may not even be any transmission active at the time of the measurement, and even if there was it would be lost among all the other radio transmissions passing through the same location, like local communications systems, TV, broadcast radio, cell phones, etc.
As a point of comparison, your cell phone sits idle monitoring a control channel the vast majority of the time. It's listening but that control channel transmission from the cell tower is certainly not going to show up on your frequency counter. Neither is the TV station miles away which your TV can nevertheless pick up.
Anyone who follows the above advice and videotapes themselves trying to "detect frequencies going to them" will just end up making an ass of themselves on YouTube and making targeted individuals as a group look like fools.
Hmm, maybe that's the whole point. On June 30, 2013 Mr. Gamache sent out another e-mail seemingly designed to bait recipients into taking self-harming actions. The following bizarre message was carbon copied to no less than 246 people:
I can't imagine that anyone would be foolish enough to do as he suggests, but perhaps there are a few desperate people out there who don't understand what is going on here and might get drawn into something like this. Well, that will wrap up one particularly egregious example of the nonsense now flooding the internet on this subject.
Here is a brief exchange with a reader of my website who is somehow involved in activism relating to this subject:
From: James Lico <[email protected]>;
I see that you want to stick to the topic of mind control. This is the problem we are having when we try to explain the the reason to authorities. No one believes us because it sounds so incredible. But now we have a new paradigm which is now believable. This is the reason why I have to inform the members of my group, because this is so controversial.
How can you tell that we are not being used as human DE lab animals?
[remainder of e-mail put forth sender's argument for DEW abuse]
Response from Jeff
You ask me how can I "tell that we are not being used as human DE lab animals?"
There are a million possible abuses that we COULD be subjected to. Just because something COULD happen does not necessarily mean that it IS happening in a particular case or to a particular group.
If I am reading your first two paragraphs correctly, you are saying that when you complain to the authorities about mind control, no one believes you because it sounds so incredible. But now, in the topic of directed energy weapons, you have found an explanation which sounds less incredible and therefore constitutes a "new paradigm which is now believable." In other words, you want to focus on something because it SOUNDS good, regardless of whether or not it is ACTUALLY relevant to your situation.
It puzzles me that your reason for wanting to "sounding believable" is because you want to "try to explain the reason to authorities." Whether it's mind control or DEWs involved, in EITHER case it is obviously being done by state actors. So your whole idea about "sounding beleivable to authorities" seems pointless in either case. That's like a Jew in 1930s Germany trying to report the existence of concentration camps to Nazi troops, and they don't believe him. Wow, what a surprise!
THE AUTHORITIES ARE THE ONES PERPETRATING THE ABUSE. THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T LISTEN TO YOUR COMPLAINTS.
I am trying to make a very simple point. MKULTRA mind control abuses using advanced neurotechnology are widespread and out of control. They are deliberately trying to confuse victims by diverting victims' attention to what I believe is the irrelevant subject of directed energy weapons. THAT is the fundamental issue facing targeted individuals.
I do not believe that abuse of D.E.W.s is widespread. EVEN IF IT WAS, however, that would not change the fact that the discussion of D.E.W.s is purposefully used as a cover for the far greater threat to human freedom posed by the deployment of classified neurotechnology against non-consenting (and mostly unaware) civilians.
I will conclude this research exhibit with an e-mail exchange that I feel nicely summarizes the point I am trying to make:
Response from Jeff
While it might be technically true to say that all radio communication is in fact a form of "directed energy," in this context it becomes a very misleading use of the phrase, which already has a well-established and particular association with weapons applications.
The perpetrators of these war crimes are waging deliberate disinformation campaigns to confuse and mislead MKULTRA subjects (targeted individuals), and promoting false theories about the abuse of "directed energy weapons" is currently one of the primary operations.
An excerpt from an e-mail I wrote to another TI activist, who had pointed out to me that voices, images and other effects could be inputted into the human brain directly by means of microwaves or electromagnetic radiation, without the use of neurotechnology:
I have some background in technology. It is my opinion that most of the talk about satellites in the context of targeted individuals is disinformation. There is simply no need to use satellites for this purpose. Terrestrial wireless data networks seem a far more likely answer. There is a reason why iPhones and Androids use cellular networks rather than satellites. Today's high speed data networks provide far more bandwidth per user than a satellite connection. The same logic should apply to implanted devices.
Also, controlling thoughts or images in the brain requires that the signal arrive intact. If it was beamed from a satellite or from someone some distance away using some kind of microwave device, the signal would be subject to interference, like static on the radio or TV, which would degrade the content. If the "beam" was not constantly focused on the target, it would "miss" or possibly affect unintended third parties. The countless reports I have studied do not support this explanation. I believe it is disinformation.
However, a wireless data connection with implanted neurotechnology could transmit the content to the implant digitally (correcting for errors). The implant then in turn modulates the content into the appropriate electrical activity in the brain. In other words, the neurotechnology acts as a "modem" or a "cell phone" in your brain.
I am convinced that this is the correct explanation. [...] I have no doubt that it may be possible to control the human brain using the means you discuss, particularly under laboratory conditions, but it seems to me that logistically it's just not possible to make it work in the field on a mass scale.
The following e-mail was received at my non-public e-mail address on November 24, 2014. More of the same. Note that the author uses an e-mail address ending with the number "33" (masonic identifier). In other words, this is clearly another abuser masquerading as a victim.
Derrick Robinson, the leader of FFCHS ("Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance"), an organization allegedly dedicated to helping victims, actively promotes what I contend is extremely harmful disinformation (see MC301) in order to confuse modern MKULTRA subjects about this topic:
And here's an excerpt from one of Derrick's newsletters, in which he again promotes this "frequency" nonsense:
So I suggest you don't start acting like a nutcase and dressing up like Chuck from the new TV show "Better Call Saul," even though many websites are out there trying to make you believe this will somehow solve your problems. Otherwise you're likely to find yourself locked up in a mental hospital being laughed at by MKULTRA doctors and psychiatrists.
Sign up now to receive free e-mail updates (sent infrequently).