You are living under a classified state of dictatorship by the C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies.
They have deployed a standing army (1) (2) (3) (4) amongst the people, against which the framers had sought to protect us.
155 years after Lincoln's "emancipation proclamation," large numbers of black people are still wearing the wrong kind of chains. (1) (2) (3)
And now they are coming for your guns.
YESTERDAY: U.S. police forces used specially-modified tanks to set ablaze the communal home of a dissident religious group in Waco, Texas (video). Residents attempting to flee from their burning home (and approximately half of whom were people of color) were machine-gunned to death by U.S. forces positioned outside the building exit (video). The CIA-controlled mass media then reported to the public that the residents were insane cult members who had committed mass suicide. Experts who studied this evidence at the time and eventually realized the truth wound up dead. As the old saying goes, "dead men tell no tales." More info at RememberWaco.com.
TODAY: The CIA-controlled mass media is employing psychological conditioning methods to convince you to willingly surrender your firearms to the state ... "because of mass shootings." If you don't surrender, then the CIA-controlled mass media will have to keep broadcasting images of terrorized children crying, until you finally give in. In reality, however, many of the perpetrators of the mass-publicized "gun violence" incidents turn out to be CIA mind control subjects (specifically including Nikolas Cruz, the Florida school schooter whose actions were immediately followed by the latest mass-media "propaganda blitz" for gun control in the USA, and also specifically including Nashville Waffle House shooter Travis Reinking). In still other cases, strong evidence exists that the mass shooters are themselves members of, or acting under the influence of, intelligence agency-sponsored cults and fraternities (details below).
The CIA is engineering many of these horrifying events in order to artificially manufacture consent on the part of the public for gun confiscation in the United States. As Mrs. Virginia Thomas, the wife of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, correctly noted, history teaches us that gun confiscation is a necessary prelude to genocide, and the current "youth movement" against guns is organized by entrenched political powers, not by the duped kids that the CIA-controlled mass media shows us on TV. Eventually, they expect us all to settle for restrictions on gun ownership by those with "mental health" issues - but the CIA-controlled psychiatric profession has preemptively defined mental illness in such a way as to include symptoms likely to be reported by mind control subjects and other dissidents (see Weaponized Psychiatry).
"[P]ower and its minions are the same in all countries and in all ages. It marks its victim; denounces it; and excites the public odium and the public hatred, to conceal its own abuses and encroachments." Senator Henry Clay, in a speech to the United States Senate, March 14, 1834.
IMPORTANT NOTICE AND PRAYER FOR THE PEOPLE OF NEW ZEALAND
New Zealand mass-shooter Brenton Tarrant stated in his "manifesto" that he acted with the blessing of the "brother knights" (importantly, note his use of the plural) of the Knights Templar (a C.I.A.-organized higher-level masonic order and drug cartel) (1) (2). Tarrant's prime inspiration, Norweigan mass-shooter Anders Breivik, was himself a member. The global intelligence agency dictatorship is sponsoring most all of the mass shootings that have been making headlines internationally in recent years. Then, as predictably as clockwork, their covertly-controlled "private" media networks tell the public to turn in their firearms. Your police, judges and legislators are overwhelmingly members, and on board with the program. Their bosses print the money for every country and sponsor expensive childrens' hospitals as public relations (P.R.) to convince the public that they are just a social club made up of wonderful philanthropic guys. But their own choice of costumes betray them: they are the wolves, and you are the sheep.
IF YOU TURN IN YOUR FIREARMS, YOU ARE TURNING THEM IN TO THE VERY PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE BLOODY MASS SHOOTINGS, AND THE BLOOD IS ON YOUR HANDS AS WELL, AND ON THE HANDS OF EVERYONE WHO GOES ALONG WITH THIS. MAY GOD DAMN THE PEOPLE OF NEW ZEALAND FOR THEIR COWARDLY SUBMISSION TO THESE C.I.A. MASS MURDERERS AND THEIR CIVILIAN DISARMAMENT PROGRAM. AND MAY GOD DAMN THE AMERICANS WHO DON'T SPEAK OUT NOW WHILE THEY STILL CAN. DOING NOTHING AND SAYING NOTHING IS JUST AS BAD AS BEING AN ACTIVE COLLABORATOR.
For many years, Andrew Tannenbaum (the author of the MINIX operating system) was not aware that that his creation had been secretly snuck into millions of Intel processors. Click here to view the "open letter" which he wrote to Intel after finding out about it.
Some readers of Slashdot, a popular tech news website, also had some interesting comments about this story:
The corporate logos of other major chip-makers also signal their true identities. AMD, one of the three major CPU manufactures (along with Intel and Apple), uses a stylized freemasonic square and compass as their logo. Compare the AMD vs masonic logo:
NVIDIA, who makes the graphics chips, uses the freemasonic Eye of Horus:
That's what I call ...
... or, in other words,
At the same time, extreme "leftist" organizations are complaining that Google is censoring them as well:
Video running time: Approx. 10 minutes
They'll censor anyone, especialy activists, who are a thorn in their side. "Left-wing" or "right-wing" labels don't matter and are themselves disinformation concepts in a very real way.
The whole point of this article is to suggest that Google shouldn't be censoring anyone, since it is in every meaningful way an arm of the state. It's legal status as a "private corporation" is simply a smokescreen designed to conceal this fact from the general public. I suggest that the citizenry needs to be made to catch on and raise a huge ruckus about this sort of thing.
It warms my heart to see how Google and Moscow are walking hand-in-hand when it comes to "delisting" websites so that nobody can find out about them any more. The right of all people to free speech and communication must yield to the rights of state-controlled megacorporations to lock down the communications infrastructure so that we only have access to officially-sanctioned content, mostly in the form of brain-dead "entertainment" and "news" programs.
We are told that we need to fight "piracy" (a scary word, conjuring up images of mauraders on the high seas) and the only way to do that is by shutting down (and deleting any references to) these evil "pirate" websites. What they're not telling you is that the free and open technogical systems that make so-called "piracy" possible are the same ones that enable people to communicate freely over the internet, sharing mass amounts of data, without being shepherded into using state-controlled -- and censored -- platforms such as Google and YouTube.
Many years ago, I came across an article that discussed how Windows XP (the extremely-popular operating system released by Microsoft in August 2001) was designed from the ground up to spread user data all over the hard disk drive, and in numerous ways to generate all kinds of forensic evidence about what a user had done with their computer. If anyone can find a copy of that article, please send it over to me using the "Contact" link at the top of the page.
During the last decade or two, a small (but significant) number of people, particularly those with greater-than-average computer skills, abandoned their expensive Macs and/or the in-your-face spying of Microsoft Windows 10, and began switching to the various "distributions" of the freely available Linux computer operating system. The licensing structure of this "free software" movement tends towards the creation of a vast culture of free software from which more and more people over time can benefit -- at least in theory. Obviously, this is something that powerful interests have worked from behind the scenes to keep under control:
Personally, I'm hoping that those Italian guys behind the Devuan project (a version of Linux without the "systemd" problem discussed in the preceding news clippings) find success, but I'm not holding my breath.
The freedom made possible by free software poses a threat to political powers that seek to control civilian populations. They, in response, predictably will oppose its use, and today seek to do so by convincing the public that freedom is evil and that, at least when it comes to technology, the only people who would want to use free and open software systems are communists and terrorists! To further this objective, loyal collaborator-minions have been placed into key positions throughout the free software movement and have already begun to dutifully carry out this important agenda. For example, the Mozilla Foundation -- a key bastion of the free software movement and maker of the popular Firefox web browser -- is already working to sabatoge the movement from within by literally associating itself with communist- and terrorist-associated organizations:
When the general public begins to hear more and more stories like this one, they will be ever-more-strongly convinced that they ought to keep using the proprietary (but familiar) computing systems from the likes of Microsoft, Google, and Apple. Which all spy on you 100% on the time, ostensibly "legally" -- because your mere use of their software indicates your "consent" to such monitoring.
Mozilla is also hoping you'll place your trust in them to identify "misinformation" on the web:
As I said above, however (in the context of Google doing the same thing), I say again: consider the source. Who, exactly, is so concerned nowadays about "helping" the general public to "fight misinformation?" What we are witnessing is the covert takeover by the state of all private entities who have any meaningful influence.
In December 2017, Mozilla began automatically slipping new plug-in software into newer versions of its Firefox browser, which users would automatically receive when the browser updated. One observer on a tech-focused discussion forum commented:
The existential reality here is that you don't have a meaningful choice when it comes to technology (or media, for that matter, as is covered elewhere on this site). They're all covertly controlled by the state, and they have a de facto monopoly. The appearance of our having a few "choices" (i.e., Google vs. Firefox -- or Apple vs. Microsoft -- or CNN vs. MSNBC) are simply illusions designed to lead the civilian population into believing that they still live in a "democracy" or other such nonsense, where meaningful freedom of choice and private competition still exists in these key areas.
The maintenance of such a facade is an age-old tactic used by military forces to pacify conquered populations. As Machiavelli wrote over five centuries ago in The Prince, "[w]henever those states which have been acquired [...] have been accustomed to live under their own laws and in freedom [..., then continue to] permit them to live under their own laws, drawing a tribute, and establishing within it an oligarchy which will keep it friendly to you." In the modern-day conquered western world, they maintain the appearance of allowing us to continue to live not only "under our own laws," but also to have freedom of choice when it comes to media and technology. But it's all the same sort of lie ... the same sort of magic trick illusion. Today, it's just done on such a grand scale that most people cannot fathom what is in fact happening.
Dr. Richard Stallman, one of the founders of the free software movement, made the following remarks about the vanishing state of privacy in the modern world:
You think you're dealing with "private" parties, but everywhere you turn nowadays, there is more covert state action.
That's great news! I'm so glad that Facebook is protecting me from seeing the disinformation sponsored by Iran. But I'm even more looking forward to the day when they start censoring the disinformation sponsored by my OWN government. Maybe they'll get around to that soon. Nah ...
Oh, and now in February 2019, it looks like the European Union has decided that is joining the Orwellian Global Censorship System ... oops, I mean the World Government Prior Restraint of Disallowed Communications Grid ... no wait, I mean the Noble Fight Against "Piracy." Yeah, that's it!
Don't get upset though, because it wouldn't be a GLOBAL dictatorship without EU participation, now would it?
Anyway, for more information on the sickening totalitarianism being imposed on the nations of Europe please see my separate research exhibit entitled The European Union's War on Democracy.
The following article is also required reading:
Video running time: 3 minutes
Video running time: 4 minutes
Video running time approx. 1 minute
Video running time: 3 minutes 22 seconds
Video running time: 15 seconds
Video running time: 2 hours 15 minutes
In early 2018, A&E produced a documentary TV program about the Davidians entitled "Waco: Madman or Messiah?" This choice of title appears to have been carefully chosen for its psychological effect: virtually everyone will subconsciously reject the idea that Koresh was a "messiah," and as a result subconsciously conclude that he therefore must obviously have been a madman -- since that was the only other of the two choices presented. This is an example of propaganda and applied psychology in action (for more on this point, see: How Emotions Affect Logical Reasoning.)
Like other dictatorships throughout history, the United States of America has a state-controlled press. What makes ours all the more sinister, however, is that here in the USA, the state control is kept secret - it's done by the CIA or other intelligence services through countless proxy "private" corporations that the public is led to believe are not state agencies, which they in fact actually are. Each of the hundreds of television channels displays a "network logo" at the bottom right corner of the screen, reinforcing the appearance that each is a separate business entity of some sort. In reality, today, virtually all mass media has been coopted by the state. The "independent business" entities are simply maintained to deceive the public into believing in the myth of a free press (a key disinformation theme), and also to allow the intelligence agencies to act in any manner they please without implicating the Constitutional doctrine of "state action." (1) (2) (3) (4)
Twenty-five years after the massacre, we still don't see the videos shown earlier in this article (much less, the complete Branch Davidian home movies made during the siege) (1) (2) on the "mainstream" TV shown to the public. Ask yourself why.
Note: Several of the following images of memorial markers to the murdered Davidians are high-resolution photos which have been shrunk to fit your screen. You can save or view the full-size versions by right-clicking on it (or using whatever other browser controls you have available).
The above link and associated video presentation is not to be confused with the 1999 documentary film of the same name:
My typing from a photocopy in my possession -- Richard J. Sanford
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Civil Action No. H-95-587 Judge Atlas
DEBORAH BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants
DECLARATION OF EDWARD F. ALLARD, PhD.
Edward F. Allard declares and states as follows:
1. My name is Edward F. Allard. I have worked for many years in the field of radiation physics related to thermal imaging, thermal signatures, thermal suppression and especially in aspects of those subjects relating to Forward Looking Infrared [FLIR] military systems.
2. My experience is set forth in my curriculum vitae, which is attached to this declaration. I received my Bachelor of Science in physics from Boston College and my doctorate in physics from the University of Missouri. I hold Patent No. 4,413,668 on a device to suppress thermal signatures and Patent no. 5,013,092 on a microdischarge image intensifier. My inventions and studies will enable use of uncooled thermal imagers with predicted performance better than the current TOW antitank missile night sight; design and calculation for these required an expert knowledge of photocathodes, photo detectors, signal detection, noise, charge transfer and optics for thermal imaging devices.
3. I began my career in this field as a supervisor at the Defense Department's Night Vision Laboratory, later becoming Deputy Director, Systems Development. My team developed and defended a variety of programs in the area, including L3TV systems, the thermal night sight for the Dragon antitank weapon, the night sight for the TOW antitank missile system, and other programs. NVL pioneered the Common Module System that is the foundation of the thermal imaging systems used in Operation Desert Storm.
4. As a defense contractor and government employee, I have analyzed a number of thermal imaging devices. These include comparisons of L3TV with thermal imagers, comparisons of American and foreign imagers, analyses of the thermal imager for the M1 tank, design of thermal pointing systems, construction of a T-62 thermal target for tank gunnery, and countermeasures to completely hide an M60 tank from enemy FLIR and to reduce FLIR signatures of tents, trucks, ships, and individual soldiers. The interpretation of FLIR imagery requires skill and experience. As but a few examples, materials which reflect sunlight and thus seem bright in the visible spectrum will often appear indistinct, or even dark, to a thermal imager; the very reflective properties that make them bright to the eye make them appear cool, and thus dark, to FLIR systems. Interpretation of thermal images requires a knowledge of the reflective properties of both natural and man-made objects.
5. I have reviewed a FLIR tape depicting the events outside Waco, Texas, on April 19, 1993, which tape was obtained from one of the defense attorneys involved in the criminal cases that arose out of those events. My analysis of the tape follows. All times given are those shown in the timeclock shown in the tape. All directions are given from the standpoint of the viewer.
6. At 11:24:31, the FLIR is recording events in the rear of the building, where the Combat Engineering Vehicle [CEV] has partially demolished the area known as the "gymnasium." The FLIR shows several flashes appearing from a point to the left of the CEV. These are elongated in shape, several feet long, and appear and disappear at a regular rate with regular spacing between them. I note five flashes from one point, appearing and disappearing at the rate of 7-10 per second. At this location some non-flashing movement also appears visible. There is no natural explanation for these flashes. Natural phenomena do not heat and cool in fractions of a second. My expert opinion is that these flashes appear to be the muzzle flashes of a fully-automatic firearm, firing at about 500 rounds per minute cyclic rate. Carefully examined, in slow motion and by frame-to-frame observation, the flashes originate to the left and progress to the right, indicating that they are being fired from a source outside the building, and fired into the building.
7. At 11:42:56, the aircraft bearing the FLIR is circling the side of the building. A hot image is visible inside the side, ground floor, window of the "corner tower." As the aircraft continues its movement the image vanishes, underscoring the fact that the image is a hot object inside the room, the sight of which is lost as the aircraft moves on and alters the perspective through the window.
8. At 11:44:52, a momentary flash of radiation is seen to the rear of the central "tower." This may be at a location in the open area to the immediate rear of the building. The flash is visible for ten frames, approximately a third of a second, much longer than the flashes described above. It is not possible with these data to determine the cause or source of the flash.
9. At 11:47:50, the FLIR is recording events at the front of the building. A CEV has driven into the building, withdrawn, and has a large piece of rubble lodged on the front of the vehicle. An individual is dimly visible exiting the vehicle, walking to its front, and dislodging the rubble. The CEV is at this point halted within a vehicle length, perhaps twenty feet, of the front of the building.
10. At 12:07:40-42, the aircraft bearing the FLIR is circling past the right tower. A heat source, long and narrow in form, quickly appears across a window of the tower. Upon careful examination, slow motion and frame-by- frame, I believe this is more likely to be a heat source outside the window, than one inside it. It is noteworthy that the image does not vanish or fade as the aircraft flies past, in contrast to the heat signature noted at 11:42:56.
11. At 12:08:32, the FLIR depicts events at the rear of the building, where the large "gymnasium" structure has largely been demolished. Two very bright thermal flashes are visible near to or in the window at the center, in front of and to one side of the CEV which is stopped there. I see no natural explanation for these flashes. They would not, for instance, be reflections of sunlight off glass.
12. At 12:08:52 there are again radiation flashes, which I believe to be firearms fire, from the side and rear of the CEV. Again, when carefully examined they appear to move in the direction of the building.
13. In brief, my examination of the FLIR tape indicates:
a. An analysis of the tape, field by field, reveals thermal flashes occurring that have pulse times and time intervals between them consistent with the intervals of automatic weapons fire. Pulses of approximately 1/15 second occur. There are no naturally- occurring phenomena that could explain these events.
b. Other thermal flashes of radiation, approximately 1/3 second in duration, occur in various areas of the building complex. Again, no naturally-occurring phenomena can explain this.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct.
Edward F. Allard, Phd.
Dated this 1 day of Feb, 1996.
For more information about the cult religious significance of holocausts (mass murder by fire), please see my companion article Freemasonry 301: Blood Debts & Human Sacrifice.
Also, be sure and check out survivor David Thibodeau's website at WacoSurvivors.com.
You can access this page directly at: RememberWaco.com
Documentary film: "Who Killed the Electric Car?"
The United States has quietly begun the process of surrendering control of domestic American infrastructure to Beijing via Chinese state-owned proxy corporations.
Video running time: 3 minutes
10/28/2017 note: the above video was removed from YouTube without warning after this article was first published.
American freemasons and other insiders have been "let in on the secret" that we have been sold out to communist China. It's good "inside info" so they all go along with it.
By definition and nature, goverment is a monopoly on power and the use of force. The only legitimate form of government is one which secures the rights of all men, which are endowed to them by their Creator. This principle has been codified in the US Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights, but applies to all human beings regardless of geographic location.
Western governments and that of China today respect absolutely ZERO human rights of anyone.
They get American dupes to buy into this treason by pointing out the obvious corruptions and abuses of the mega-corporations, then present communism as though it is some kind of solution. But anyone who has done any research knows that the same international banking syndicates control both "capitalism" and "communism." Any apparent "differences" between the two are only on the surface.
CNOOC closes $15.1 billion acquisition of Canada's Nexen
Video running time: 3 minutes
Video running time: 1 min 22 seconds
As P.T. Barnum stated, "there's a sucker born every minute."
IMPORTANT: SEE ALSO Mind Control 201 - Brain Implant Bloopers
(live news feeds in which television reporters experience apparent neurological malfunctions)
British Newspapers Challenge New Press Rules
By STEPHEN CASTLE and ALAN COWELL
Published March 19, 2013
LONDON — A day after British lawmakers agreed to ground rules for a new press code, an array of newspapers protested on Tuesday against the attempt to impose stricter curbs on this country’s scoop-driven dailies following the phone hacking scandal that convulsed Rupert Murdoch’s media empire and much of British public life.
In a statement, the newspaper society representing 1,100 newspapers said provisions for fines of up to $1.5 million on errant newspapers would impose a “crippling burden” on cash-strapped publications struggling against the inroads of the Internet.
“A free press cannot be free if it is dependent on and accountable to a regulatory body recognized by the state," the president of the society, Adrian Jeakings, said.
Indeed, the conservative Daily Mail commented in an editorial, “The bitter irony is this long-drawn out debate comes when the Internet — which, being global, has no regulatory restraints — is driving newspapers out of business.”
“If politicians had devoted half as much of their energies to keeping a dying industry alive, instead of hammering another nail into its coffin, democracy would be in a healthier state today.”
Newspaper proprietors and editors have not so far signed on to the agreement announced on Monday and say they were excluded from late-night cross-party talks on the new code while privacy campaigners clamoring for tighter press controls took part in the deliberations. Some indicated on Tuesday that they would not be rushed into responding to the proposed restrictions.
“We need to go back a long way — to 1695, and the abolition of the newspaper licensing laws — to find a time when the press has been subject to statutory regulation. Last night, Parliament decided that 318 years was long enough to let newspapers and magazines remain beyond its influence, and agreed a set of measures that will involve the state, albeit tangentially, in their governance,” the conservative Daily Telegraph said.
Lawmakers on Monday “urged the newspaper industry to endorse the new dispensation as quickly as possible,” the newspaper said. “However, after 318 years of a free press, its detail deserves careful consideration.”
The agreement announced Monday creates a system under which erring newspapers will face big fines and come up against a tougher press regulator with new powers to investigate abuses and order prominent corrections in publications that breach standards.
The deal, struck in the early hours of Monday, enshrines the powers of the regulator in a royal charter — the same document that sets out the rules and responsibilities of the British Broadcasting Corporation and the Bank of England.
That ended a fierce dispute, which divided the coalition government, over whether new powers should instead be written into law.
The idea of legislation raised alarms among those cherishing three centuries of broad peacetime freedom for Britain’s newspapers. They included Prime Minister David Cameron, who said a law establishing a press watchdog would cross a Rubicon — Caesar’s point of no return — toward government control because it could be amended to be even stricter by future governments that might want to curb the press.
"The Lynching" (Clip from Afterburner with Bill Whittle)
Video running time: Ten minutes
Video running time: 3 minutes
Video running time: 4 minutes
Hmm, this reminds me of another "homeland security" proclamation from two and a half centuries ago . . . one that also warned of the danger posed by "sovereign citizen extremists":
Further reading: George III on How Not to Handle a Crisis
[...] Perhaps it would be wise to review America’s founding principles regarding overgrown military establishments and the threat they pose to the liberty of the citizenry, in addition, that is, to the sentiments against overgrown military establishments expressed by America’s first president, George Washington:
James Madison: “A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defence agst. foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home. Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a war, whenever a revolt was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the armies kept up under the pretext of defending, have enslaved the people.”
Patrick Henry: “A standing army we shall have, also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny; and how are you to punish them? Will you order them to be punished? Who shall obey these orders? Will your mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment?”
Henry St. George Tucker in Blackstone’s 1768 Commentaries on the Laws of England: “Wherever standing armies are kept up, and when the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.”
Commonwealth of Virginia in 1788: “… that standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, and therefore ought to be avoided, as far as the circumstances and protection of the community will admit; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power.”
Pennsylvania Convention: “… as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military shall be kept under strict subordination to and be governed by the civil power.”
U.S. State Department website: “Wrenching memories of the Old World lingered in the 13 original English colonies along the eastern seaboard of North America, giving rise to deep opposition to the maintenance of a standing army in time of peace. All too often the standing armies of Europe were regarded as, at best, a rationale for imposing high taxes, and, at worst, a means to control the civilian population and extort its wealth.”
Finally, let’s wrap up this piece with the warning that President Eisenhower issued in his 1961 Farewell Address regarding America’s new, Cold War-era, overgrown military establishment:
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. . . .Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. . . . In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted.
Mark your calendars! November 23 is "Simas Kudirka Day."
Eight years later (in 1978), CBS aired a made-for-television movie special about the Kudirka incident. It starred Alan Arkin of M*A*S*H fame. I've seen the film and highly recommend that you do, too.
As of November, 2014, it looks like there is also a custom-burned DVD-R version of the movie is being sold on Amazon here. You can also search Google to try and find a copy of the movie. And here's a copy of the film that I found posted to YouTube in late 2018 -- unfortunately, whoever created this version of the video did a bad job and part of the picture is missing. But it's the only copy available online right now, and as such might be worth viewing if you don't have the money to buy a DVD copy:
Video running time: 2 hrs 15 mins
Also in 1978, Kudirka put out a book about his experiences. It's also out of print, but it looks like there are a few copies available used at the time I write this. If you care about freedom and liberty, this might be a nice addition to your library.
Kudirka's ordeal reminds me of the Elian Gonlazes situation back in 2000. After a scene like this, I'm not surprised Elian grew up to decide that communist Cuba wasn't quite so bad.
Nice helmet, dude! You might want to ask yourself why America today allows a virtual tidal wave of illegal economic immigrants from Mexico to pour into the country, with no end in sight, yet isolated political refugees from communist countries who risk their lives attempting to get to the USA and freedom are quickly captured and dutifully shipped back to their countries of origin.
That sure is one heck of a coincidence! Yes, indeed.
Excerpt from Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823), a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court:
Evian is "naive" spelled backwards.
Video running time: 15 seconds
These are NOT Gold or Silver Certificates. They are ordinary Federal Reserve Notes.
Most of the images of full bills (not close-ups) that you see on this page are shrunk to fit your screen. If you want to see them in full-detail, right-click on the image and choose View or Save , so you will be better able to read what they actually say.
Article 1, Section. 10
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
“Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars.”
Russell L. Munk, Assistant General Counsel, Department of the Treasury, February 18, 1977.
“The term 'dollars' likewise is incorrect, which, according to constitutional definition, are monetary units, used in exchange, backed by gold and silver. Our present day fiat issues are supported by more printed paper of the same; therefore, they are correctly termed Federal Reserve Notes (FRN), not dollars."
Robert P. Vichas, Handbook of Financial Mathematics, Formulas, and Tables (1979), p. 420.
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars and they are not lawful money. They are "bills" that the bank has to pay. What they owe us is Lawful Money -- not foreclosure notices.
"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."
President Franlin D. Roosevelt
November 21st, 1933
US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Field wrote as part of his dissenting opinion in this case:
From the decision of the court I see only evil likely to follow. There have been times within the memory of all of us when the legal-tender notes of the United States were not exchangeable for more than one-half of their nominal value. The possibility of such depreciation will always attend paper money. This inborn infirmity no mere legislative declaration can cure. If congress has the power to make the notes a legal tender and to pass as money or its equivalent, why should not a sufficient amount be issued to pay the bonds of the United States as they nature? Why pay interest on the millions of dollars of bonds now due when congress can in one day make the money to pay the principal? And why should there be any restraint upon unlimited appropriations by the government for all imaginary schemes of public improvement, if the printing-press can furnish the money that is needed for them?
Possessing a "dollar bill" allows you to bill the bank for a lawful dollar. But they aren't paying -- and they haven't paid since 1934. This is theft which is a crime. This particular crime rises to the level of high treason, because our country has literally been stolen from right under our feet. Those in power who have knowingly supported this ongoing fraud should be held accountable.
This exhibit was based in large part on the research of Irwin Schiff, who has been incarcerated in a federal penitentiary in order to shut him up.
Update: On October 16, 2015, Irwin Schiff passed away from cancer, while shackled to his bed, in the infirmary of the prison where he had been incarcerated for almost ten years. He was 87 years old. For more information, see this eulogy written by his son Peter Schiff.
High-level thievery by the megabanks is presently a major issue in Europe as well:
Sign up now to receive free e-mail updates (sent infrequently).